no, no you need to focus on evidence to convict. and they didn t. it is what it is. you don t know that they didn t. they didn t come back with the verdict that you wanted. the defense was successful at least arguing planting the seed, that the dna could have been there because it was wiped away on a a towel. they were able to bring in the seeds of doubt to plant with this jury. look, the dna, you can t, i mean, i guess you can try. i guess this case stands for the proposition that dna isn t enough but this isn t ncis or csi. this is real law, real courtrooms. this is a real case. this is the kind of evidence that you get and, the fact is, that he gave some story to the jury that the victim may have brought a dish home from a party that the accused was at. and i thought it was, personally i thought it was way out there but what the heck. i was flat wrong on this one. uma: esther, you have the final word here. the jury did what juries do. this is why fred and i don t sit on ju