is thick. and trimming that 20 to thirty percent you can t open it up but do i understand what we re considering the removal of the tree that you re willing considering putting two trees. i m willing if it fits i don t have any objection. before you sit down. when did you occur the property it was owned by my cousin i ve had it about since 2006. 2006? so seven years yeah. six or seven. okay. thank you. well, i ve moved to continue this if ms. short is willing to work with the appellant to see if we can craft some kind of a compromise is that okay. how much time do we need. from public works. we can do it we re launching the forest plan next week the 29. 29 it should be fine. is that okay with you mr. mcclellan. (inaudible). can you come up to the microphone mr. mcclellan? thank you i have a conflict but i can it looks like i can make that conflict workout. i m going to move to continue - i m sorry. you can sit down. i really like that tree. it
over the curb for vertigo traffic and access over the sidewalk. if there are no conflicts that the utility we won t request it but the property owner has flatten the responsibility in the past are there restrictions with a tree of that size would be 3r50u7bd other than maintaining the health. our ordinance requires the triz trees are 3r50u7b9d with the american standard pruning standards as well as the international society of our best practice management whichever it more protection. no more than 1/3rd of the canopy can be removed okay. thank you. is there any public comment on this item okay. seeing none. mr. mcclellan we have 3 minutes of rebuttal for you thank you there was made reference to the fact there s a public benefit to 80 this tree. now there s public benefits to street trees and this is a mutual may be with lots of street trees there s no public beverages. there s heavy street traffic and the recommendation to jack hammer up the sidewalk. i m not sure
let me see. i think i can - maybe i can work maybe i should turn it around. okay. this is the line of the original foundation of the north foundation of 25 trouf and the bottom of the under pinning piece. we want to have the underpinning not to expose them. the agreement was to provide 25 inches to the bottom underpinning piece. the drawings show it s not 24 inch to the bottom of the foundation but 24 inch to the bottom of the drain route. so i have been working with mr. yeez and his team. now, mr. you rained a new structural engineer the team was solomon to replace the fan who was the civil engineer on the project but he since then moved out of the area and declined to participate on the project no more. i filed on appeal on december 29th on behalf of the issuing of the permit 20131188 because we wanted to see that the appropriate revision could be done to protect ms. taungz property. now allen of the mechanics engineer i asked the team to bring him on board so he can contin
but the property owner has flatten the responsibility in the past are there restrictions with a tree of that size would be 3r50u7bd other than maintaining the health. our ordinance requires the triz trees are 3r50u7b9d with the american standard pruning standards as well as the international society of our best practice management whichever it more protection. no more than 1/3rd of the canopy can be removed okay. thank you. is there any public comment on this item okay. seeing none. mr. mcclellan we have 3 minutes of rebuttal for you thank you there was made reference to the fact there s a public benefit to 80 this tree. now there s public benefits to street trees and this is a mutual may be with lots of street trees there s no public beverages. there s heavy street traffic and the recommendation to jack hammer up the sidewalk. i m not sure with the benefit is for the public good. the other thing is that, you know, over the last, you know, 40 years the amount of hab
turn it around. okay. this is the line of the original foundation of the north foundation of 25 trouf and the bottom of the under pinning piece. we want to have the underpinning not to expose them. the agreement was to provide 25 inches to the bottom underpinning piece. the drawings show it s not 24 inch to the bottom of the foundation but 24 inch to the bottom of the drain route. so i have been working with mr. yeez and his team. now, mr. you rained a new structural engineer the team was solomon to replace the fan who was the civil engineer on the project but he since then moved out of the area and declined to participate on the project no more. i filed on appeal on december 29th on behalf of the issuing of the permit 20131188 because we wanted to see that the appropriate revision could be done to protect ms. taungz property. now allen of the mechanics engineer i asked the team to bring him on board so he can continue participation on the project so we can have a meeting of