comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Prosecution closing argument - Page 1 : comparemela.com

Transcripts For FOXNEWSW Hannity 20240702

i have a travel advisory for new york city, a very conservative or a republican or a trump supporte york citr. beware in the weaponized biden criminal justice system. well, political differences are now considered especially heinou, politis. h and if new york s powerful democrats hate your politicsei, well, a prison cell might well be in your future or some kind of conviction for something. well, that they make up withouts a second thought. well, those these democrats, a crie make up a crim conduct, a show trial rig, tri a conviction with a hand-pickea, biden donating judge, regardless of the evidence. if they could even explain i regardlet. and just hours ago, the former president of the unitehours agd states now running for a second term, donald j. trump, wasrunning fo convicted d felony counts and will be sentenced o h, a few daysa before the republican convention. how convenientfew days. but most americans, including people in that very courtroocano can t even identify th

Transcripts For FOXNEWSW Hannity 20240702

we start with the fox news alert, travel advisory for new york city. conservative or republican or trump supporter beware and the weather nizam biden criminal justice system, political differences are now considered especially heinous. and if new york s powerful democrats your politics a prison cell might be in your future or some kind of conviction. something that they make up. without a second thought, these democrats so make up a crime conductor show trial and rigour conviction with a hand-picked bite and donating judge, regardless of the evidence if they can explain it. and hours ago the former president of the united states now running for a second term, donald trump convicted in all 34 sent only counts and will be sentenced a few days before the republican convention. how convenient. most americans including people in that very courtroom cannot even identify the felonies. that is because this is a conviction without a crime against joe biden s chief political rival in t

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20130711:15:00:00

wheel and on foot. so we had hashed that out, i thought. i understand mr. west didn t think any of it is credible or right. respectfully, that s up to the jury, not mr. west. so the issue is i think the provocation language should be included. the only issue that i hear is whether or not it also ought to on top of the issue of provocation include the phrase force or threat of force. and again, carrying a firearm or grabbing or accosting to the point that someone hears let go and a physical struggle, that is evidence of force or threat of force. it doesn t say gibbs certainly doesn t say deadly force because of course gibbs is itself a nondeadly force case in the first instance. so the state s argument is the

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20130711:15:13:00

a decision based upon an improper legal premise. because the state can t make that argument legally and i m moving in li mchmliminc about. that motion is denied. next paragraph, it starts in considering the issue. there doesn t seem to be any objection or difference in that paragraph. am i correct? yes. and the next one is if in your consideration of the issue of self defense, it s a three line paragraph, are there any objections to that paragraph? no, i think that s the standard language now. that you thin

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20130711:15:11:00

otherwise you can t say it s illegal to do that. i ve heard the argument from both sides. aim not giving that instruction. we split that s an integral part of our theory of the defense and the court commits error by not instructing the jury properly on the law. i understand. i ve already ruled. and you continually disagree with this court every time i make a ruling. i have provided you on three separate occasions with the court s professional conduct in the courtroom. and included in that is do not continue to argue with the court after we ve ruled. if i have made a mistake in this case, you will appeal if there is a conviction, it will get appealed to a higher court and they can review it to determine whether or not may a mistake. this is my ruling on this issue. you are free to communicate that to the jury in your closing argument. i m not instructing them on that. moving on to

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.