Live Breaking News & Updates on Program Framework|Page 7
Stay updated with breaking news from Program framework. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
The moment, cac 40 down, ftse off by just under 2 10 of 1 , still waiting for the dax to open. We are not seeing that optimism we were seeing in the markets yesterday at the moment. I want to show you the main stocks we are watching, starting with siemens. Fourthquarter profit was a beat, and what we heard is that the company will raise the dividend, also announcing its second Share Buyback since the ceo took the helm two years ago, as he expects no broken 2016 Profit Margins. Rollsroyce we arent seeing in move yet, but profit this year will be at the lower end of the range than forecast because of additional headwinds in the aerospace and marine market. Sharply weaker demand is forecast. Finally, burberry this was a profit the firsthalf after the company had been cutting cost, because the challenge it has been facing mainly in china. That led it to have this profit warning la ....
Think history will record, is that you were not fully functioning until may of 2013. That is about 8. 5 years lost of a very critical mission. Let me just say that a goal in the law, certainly my personal goal was to have in the law certainty that liberty and security were reinforcing values in the policies and practices that we established under the law. Is if ever that function were needed, it is right now. Me that youunate to were one of the best kept secrets in washington. I know you are making a massive effort to get out there and i commend you for it. Urgenthink the need is and you, uniquely among the different groups in looking at arepolicies and practices, able to make sure from the inside that we are doing the right things. Let me make two other points. Germanyas in berlin, a week ago today, at , dinner for top policy types think tank leaders, and business people. All of whom were shocked and horrified by the revolution europeanns revealed in newspapers. When i told them that ....
As a result its finding parking in the sunset district you have a lot more People Living in those areas when each unit was occupied by two deputies with children so some complained about that. And also your allowing garages that are now being used as illegal units to remain so even though theres a requirement in many districts to be one to one parking so its going to keep the problem bad. A lot of people are parking on the street and renting out their garages and many people who occupy those units have their own cars. I think we need to look at this and be advisable some districts that will welcome this and we should have the ability for the different districts to decide rather than onesizefitsall. Then some of the other things ive talked about some of my suggestions as to requiring everyone to be surveyed and then the issue of a condo sale there will be issues when someone wants to upgrade and you know it doesnt hurt to have an ad ....
For the one unit to be sold off. I believe that supervisor wiener stated last week he doesnt want to opine on whether or not the additional unit he was allowed to be in this ordinance would be added whether it be a rental or ownership unit. I want to see this by the way, i think it will meet another need for people to guy homes to get into San Francisco. I know that another part 0 allows nor pass on to the tenant this should be looked at so some degree the tenants are living there knowing with the unit is not legal sometimes theyre not aware of the situation but i think that some of the costs i dont know what percentage might be allowed to be paid by the tenant over a period of time because their take advantageing of the life and safety and a prorated percentage being paid by the tenants makes sense to me. Then i guess there a or is a government code for one unit to be addressed to 0 singlefamily home. Im not sure how 80 this plays ....
Have said that judges do this. We have said this is appropriate for judges even in the absence of this. It is right there in the constitution. Asked how ever really we get more in store for judges in the first place. Katie that is the answer, but it is right there in the first amendment. I dont think so because the case law has suggested it does not test the neutral magistrate does not need to be a judge or lawyer. Could be someone who is a court clerk. It could be someone inside the executive branch who could count as a judge for Fourth Amendment purposes. This goes back to the difficulty of figuring out how to categorize search warrant applications. The fact that you can have a nonjudge issue a search warrant takes it outside of the and suggestsystem that may not be a judicial function. Is usually a gray area. There are extraordinary context where you can pursue, seek to challenge. Traditionally the understanding has been no. ....