Test. Test. Test. Test. Test. Test. Its not effective to establish an effective repeat infringe of policy. It ignores red flags with patterns of infringement by certain users. Youtube often out tos content i. D. As an unrequired benefit to rights holders. It is not an unrequired benefit to rights holders. Its far from perfect, again, still allowing millions of online content to sift through the system. Theres no realistic way that rights holders can unilaterally review trillions of pages necessary to identify infringements and protect their rights and Online Services and platforms can. They are the gatekeepers, not us. Thank you, mr. Henley and mr. Hanson, if i come back for another round i may ask you to talk about the same subject and mr. Henley, i think you were really describing on a broader basis the sheer numbers of people who were experiencing the frustration of feeling like they had been robbed as mr. Preston described in his opening comments. Before i go to Ranking Member coon
Captions Copyright National cable satellite corp. 2008 thats the job for a historian. Most historians, if they think about photographs at all, focus on them as images not material objects and as illustrations rather than as primary sources that can and should themselves be the subject of historical analysis. Watch ken burns 1996 series on the west and Pay Attention to his treatment of the pueblo revolt of 1680. While he uses engravings of spaniards it to visual issize the story he relies on 19th and 20th century sorry gave away my story there, trying to highlight this picture here, he relies on 19th and 20th century photographs to depict the pueblo protagonists. This approach conveys an insidious image. European people change with time. One would never use images from two centuries later to depict them, but native peoples live on in an unchanging past, a photograph made 240 years later is just fine. We are susceptible to this historical use of photographs when we do not know better. I
We know that from the kilo case where Justice Scalia said when cuttingedge technology is used in that case to invade the privacy of the home then a warrant was presumptively required and the jones case suggested that even outside the home you might have an expectation of privacy against cuttingedge technology. In the end, the government is limited in its ability to record our conversations in public by state and federal laws, but the expectation of privacy test would have protected you against the laser beam. James, welcome to landmark cases. Youre on. Hi. When Justice Stewart delivered the opinion in court he took issue with the way the petitioner act tomorrow lated the questions which included a, whether a public telephone booth was a publicly protected area and physical penetration was necessary before search and seizure could be said were violations to the Fourth Amendment to the United States constitution. He added a couple of words in there. One was in place of right to privacy.
National conversation through cspans Daily Program or through our social media feeds. Cspan created by americas Cable Television companies as a Public Service and brought to you today by your television provider. All persons having business before the Honorable Supreme Court of the United States are admonished to draw near and give their attention. Landmark cases, cspans special history series produced in partnership with the National Constitution center. Exploring the human stories and constitutional dramas behind 12 historic Supreme Court decisions. Mr. Chief justice and may it please the court. Quite often in many of our most famous decisions are ones that the court took that were quite unpopular. Lets go through a few cases that illustrate very dramatically and visually what it means to live in a society of different people who help stick together because they believe in a rule of law. Good evening and welcome to cspan landmark cases. Tonights case is katz versus the United States,
To participate in todays hearing. Members are reminded to keep p their video function on at all ible for hemsel theyre notot recognized by the chair. Ve the members are also reminded ey that they are responsible for muting and unmuting themselves. To mute themselves after they r have finished speaking. Consistent with regulations, 96s astaff will only mute members and witnesses as appropriate when not recognized to avoid inadvertent background noise an otherre embarrassments. Members are reminded that all house rules related to order ano decorum apply to this remote trn hearing. G this hearings entitled exposure notification and Contact Tracing, how ai helps localities open safety and researchers finn it pure. Statem i will now recognize myself for four minutes to give an openingc statement. Good morning. Todays hearing will focus on the essential trade offs that ry the covid19 pandemic is forcing upon us to make between life, liberty, privacy, and the pursuit of happiness. A and the r