Stay updated with breaking news from Program content. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
So maybe thats the worry. Not so much what were doing here, but that there arent enough providers to respond to the weve got a bottle neck, and that has really been a concern from the beginning. Thank you. Yes, commissioners. I have a question. Well, actually, it pertains to actually the education in preparation within the various disciplines. cause you mentioned that we have a very highly trained, talented group of surgeons, and the fact that we have an increase in surgeries, and the increase is decided by our colleague here, i guess the thought that sort of flashed to me is that the different specialties that are certified by San Francisco general, we have, iklike urology, which haa number of specialties in it that participate in numerous, i assume, surgeries here, and they have the Residency Program where they have a major cohort, and their subspecialties, where they hav ....
Of something that we may face is that once we are certified in these new disciplines where their discipline, theyre Board Certified in urology, but all these sub areas that are involved in all this, a number of them are going to other places, especially southern california, chicago, etcetera. Theres a big recruitment going on quietly. Ive heard this from a number of those who have completed programs, and patients who were upset because maybe theres no longer a Spanish Speaking urologist who was a key person there or someone else, and i wondered if, in fact if, in fact, you are projecting that there will be even more demand for us to maintain the highest quality of physicians which we have at the general, as we see its going to be a question of how do we retain them afterwards, even though who are in the bay area and could rotate through there when the competition in other ....
Informationni inconr fivenini m toni startnrnrq . makingconko understand thaii this is coming and butni there could beni prop p j mumm 9m . Rni with t meeting obligations. For properties that are warehoused and 3. 5 increase, gross receipt increase for commercial rent. Ive highlighted different exemptions so if properties lets just say, retail sales and services, Small Business, and that section of the property would not be subject to the commercial rent increase. The other one is one that will be put on by the board of supervisors and that one is covering housing and homelessness in terms of the what the increase in Gross Revenue and that is projecting 1. 7 gross receipt increase for commercial rent. Again, that chart highlights what is subject to the commercial rent increase and what is exempt. So just want to highlight. That one does require a super majority. So and then ....
The meting will come to ord order. This is the february 23rd, 2018 special meeting of the San Francisco local Agency Formation commission. I am sandra leigh fewer, chair of the commission. I am joined by commissioner cynthia pollock on my left and hillary rope then on my right. I would also like to thank the staff at sfgovtv, for recording todays meetings. Madam clerk, do you have any announcements . Madam clerk, can you please read item number two. Item 2 is the approval of the lafco Meeting Minutes of november 30, 2017 workshop, and the november 30, 2017 regular meeting. Thank you. Do any of the commissioners have any changes to the november 30, 2017 minutes . Yes, i do. Under opening remarks and proposals presented by the commission, i recall it says rise chair pollock provided the following two proposals, broad ban ....
Would pull that deck back from the edge of the building into a position of where it meets the first angle of the bay to give a little bit more breathing room. The deck is sufficiently large that that wouldnt do a lot of damage. Are you following me, mr. Washington, what im trying to say . So what you would like to see is the deck on the south side moved into the edge of the bay. Thats correct. On the north side, i would put a trellis on the extension of the building where it currently sits. Why on the north side, commissioner . Because its too close. Youre still looking into the bay of the adjoining building. Youre standing out there, youre looking into the bay, youre looking into the large portion of that picture window, as well, and i just think its too intrusive. Okay. So is that a motion to take d. R. . Its a motion to take d. R. And deal with privacy issues on the north and south side with the two moves that i described mr. Washington sketched out. Commissioner moore, were going t ....