to a teenager for explicit photos. the bbc has released new details of its investigation into the claims. it says just two attempts were made over several weeks to contact the family concerned. the bbc s director general tim davie confirmed that the unnamed presenter was not spoken to about the issue until seven weeks after the initial complaint when new information had emerged. he also conceded, that the allegations had been clearly damaging . the bbc has been asked to pause its investigation by police while they make further inquiries. on may 18th, the complainant went to a bbc building to make the initial allegation. the following day, the complaint was assessed by the bbc s corporate investigations team. that team decided that the complaint did not include an allegation of criminality, but nonetheless merited further investigation. also on may 19th, the bbc says it emailed the complainant but received no response. untiljune 6th when the bbc says it made a phone call to t
the sunday show. in 1974, richard nixon resigned the presidency in disgrace, following watergate. almost 50 years after that scandal rocked the nation, donald trump has been impeached twice. and now indicted twice. the first ex president to face criminal charges from the federal government. he will be arraigned on tuesday in federal court in miami. the indictment, and still bit special counsel jack smith on friday revealed 37 counts against trump, six against his personal, it walter nauta. it accused both men of lying, scheming and misleading officials in order to hold on to hundreds of classified documents. documents federal investigators said quote, included information regarding defense and weapons capabilities of both the united states and foreign countries, united states nuclear programs, potential vulnerabilities of the united states and its allies to military attack and plans for a possible retaliation in response to a foreign attack. to make matters worse, trump s
speedily. july, i think we acted very speedily- july, i think we acted very seedil . ,, july, i think we acted very seedil . ., speedily. so when you look at the timetable, speedily. so when you look at the timetable. you speedily. so when you look at the timetable, you are speedily. so when you look at the timetable, you are quite - speedily. so when you look at the timetable, you are quite satisfied| timetable, you are quite satisfied with it? i timetable, you are quite satisfied with it? ~ timetable, you are quite satisfied with it? ~ ., , ., with it? i think that s the wrong characterisation. with it? i think that s the wrong characterisation. i with it? i think that s the wrong characterisation. i understand i with it? i think that s the wrong l characterisation. i understand the timetable and follow the process. what i ve said is you always have lessons that you learn from these situations and we are doing two things, firstly, i think there is a valid question that
interpretation, when i look at it, i see that we interpretation, when i look at it, i see that we have followed the process see that we have followed the process. we are doing two things. firstly, process. we are doing two things. firstly, i process. we are doing two things. firstly, i think there is a valid question. firstly, i think there is a valid question, which is how our complaints like this red flag throughout the organisation? i want that immediately looked at. also, we review that immediately looked at. also, we review the that immediately looked at. also, we review the overall processing protocols to ensure we are satisfied. protocols to ensure we are satisfied- protocols to ensure we are satisfied. .. , ., ., ,~ satisfied. the fact, i should ask ou, did satisfied. the fact, i should ask you. did any satisfied. the fact, i should ask you. did any of satisfied. the fact, i should ask you, did any of you satisfied. the fact, i should ask you, did any of you
concerns of duty of care in privacy, i do concerns of duty of care in privacy, i do not concerns of duty of care in privacy, i do not think concerns of duty of care in privacy, i do not think you take that complaint directly to a presenter. if complaint directly to a presenter. if you complaint directly to a presenter. if you just complaint directly to a presenter. if you just work that through, any core if you just work that through, any core that if you just work that through, any core that has not been verified just -ets core that has not been verified just gets brought in front of someone, what gets brought in front of someone, what i gets brought in front of someone, what i would say, i think it s important, it is right to validate that to important, it is right to validate that to have notjust important, it is right to validate that to have not just the important, it is right to validate that to have notjust the services team that to have notjust the services tea