between saying the fight is going to take months and also saying that different phases will take place at different times over those months. welcome. this morning, the white house working to downplay differences with israel on the timeline of this war. u.s. officials telling cnn the biden administration wants to transition to a lower intensity phase of the war within weeks, while israel says the fighting will last more than several months. meantime the house heading home without passing aid to ukraine and western intelligence agencies are gaming out just how long it can last without additional help. one american military official saying ukraine is certain to fail without us. we re going to take a closer look at that ominous timeline. on verdict watch this morning. jurors deciding how much rudy giuliani should pay for his election lies, specifically about two poll workers. they ll be deliberating again this morning. cnn this morning starts right now. good morning, ever
i m lindsey reiser we have breaking news this thursday morning dramatic video released from the u.s. military showing the alarming moment a russian fighter jet clipped a u.s. drone sending it crashing into the black sea. u.s. officials calling the action unsafe, unprofessional, aggressive nbc news confirming those actions were approved from the government and janet yellen in the hot seat this morning as regulators race to alleviate fears. the treasury secretary set to begin testifying before the senate finance committee any second second plus the new alarm bills about two other banks under massive pressure as the fallout from the silicon valley bank continues. and back off or get banned a source close to the mega popular app confirms to nbc news the biden administration has demanded iktok s chinese owner sell their stakes in the app or face a possible ban in the u.s what does it mean for the millions of tiktok users in the u.s. and a major escalation into one of the i
absurd claims. since the fbi searched donald trump s private residence and members club back in august. the ex-president declassified all the documents that he could declassify them if he wanted to, quote, even by thinking about it. it is a claim that has been repeated over and over and over again by trump and his allies. the disgraced ex-president mentioned it in public and the media appearances so many times. not one single time has that claim been made in a court of law. now new reporting suggests that the question of whether there is an a proof that he declassified the documents is a major interest to prosecutors at doj. new york times is reporting that federal prosecutors and former president trump s handling of national security documents, what a question one of his confident ants about a claim that trup declassified the documents. that confidante is cash patel, one of trump s biggest defenders in the documents investigation. he is a trump loyalist who made a career o
for this drug, the label, the instructions, and requirements for taking this drug, whether those things match up. the defense, though, the government arguing that this case has no merit, that this is a drug that has been on the market for more than two decades and millions of women have taken this drug safely five million women since it was approved with only 28 deaths associated with the drug, and arguing that ruling in the plaintiff s favor in this case would be a, quote, unprecedented action that would cause injury to the public interest, lindsey. dasha burns, thank you. joining me is rachel, director of the women s march. rachel, thanks for being with us what are you expecting after the hearing, and what next steps is your group planning? i think given the concerning nature of the way the case is moving forward procedurely, given it s being heard in court, we re not expecting anything
happened already? the way this procedurely takes place is cash patel and lawyers show up in the grand jury and cash patel asserts the fifth amendment. as lon as there is a good faith belief that a truthful answer would tend to incriminate you and can just be a building block. i doesn t have to be i committed a crime. it can be some fact that the government can use to lead to a potential criminal case. it s extremely unusual for the government to challenge somebody who is asserting the fifth amendment n 21 years in the government, i never done it. i never heard of anyone doing it. and it seems like there was that push back by the government. and that the court, according to their reporting, sided with mr. patel and said does he have a valid basis to assert the fifth amendment. and that means that government has to decide are they going to