University, and i will provide over this panel, talking about the 17 nineties. Then and, now thinking about allegedly put between that fragile moment between the 17 nineties and how we might think about what we can learn about that moment and how it connects or does not connect to what is happening in american political history at this moment. So i will introduce the four panelists, each person will talk for five to seven minutes and develop a few lines of inquiry. I will ask a few people based on what people said and folks will have a chance to have a conversation here, but we want to leave the last 45 to 30 minutes for questions for the audience. So, as we are going have in mind thinks that you want to say or things you want to ask about. I want to introduce folks from my left to right. So, first is katlyn carter. Katlyn its a visiting University Professor at the university of notre dame, her ph. D. Is from president. She spent two years as a post doctoral fellowship as a wiser cente
Test. Test test test. Test. Test test. Test test test. Test. Test test. Test test test. So i am just going to talk about what my research us. The reteak that they serve on existing elite, or aristocratic, didnt really fit republican ideals, and because they were privately run they could not be changed enough. So they thought that the academies that the federalist created just credentialed people that had status. So create a public system that allowed people to rise that would often have a universalish for white man Public Schools and a nation nal man and finally the was those that thought all white men should get the same education and sufficient to prepare any citizen for public office. And this was the way to make sure you could have competent ones. In the end, i think this debate reminds us that decisions about who to educate and how our so ill leave it at that. And pass it down the line. Thank you all again for being here. I think if i looked at the program correctly, this is the o
What we can learn from that moment i how it connects our does not connect to what is happening in american political history at this moment. The way this is going to work, i will introduce the four panelists. Each person will talk for five minutes or so. Develop a few lines of inquiry. I will ask a few questions based upon what people have said. Folks will have a chance to have a conversation. We want to leave the last 35 or 40 minutes for questions. Please have in mind things that you want to say or ask about. I will introduce folks from my left to my right. First is katlyn carter. She is a visiting professor at the university of notre dame. Her phd is from princeton. She spent the last two years with a postdoctoral fellowship at the university of michigan. She is working on a book entitled houses of glass, secrecy, transparency, and the Representative Democracy and i have had the pleasure of reading the manuscript. It is about the french revolution in the 1790s and the american const
Captioning performed by vitac hello, my name is bill white. I am in the Cornerstone Program at purdue but in another life i was a historian. I walked into graduate school in 1969, not quite 1912 when the book on the cabinet was written, but a long, long time ago. So i have a generic history graphic question that i want to take all the panelists to the first word of the conference, remaking american political history. Are there sources or questions that you and other scholars are asking in 20182019, 2020 that just would not have been asked, would never have been thought of when i walked into graduate school 50 years ago . Great question. Thank you. Somebody want to be brave and go first . Sure. So i think that from my own personal work there has been a renewed turn to looking at institutions as structures, as bodies of people who are responding to International Issues and pressures and trying to prove themselves on an International Stage, to understanding that the states the federal sta
The beginning of the conference. My name is seth i teach history at the university. And im here to proceed over this panel. Talking about the 1790s then and now thinking about the relationship between the particularly fragile moment in american political history which was the 1790s. And how we might think about what we can learn from that moment and how it connects or maybe it doesnt connect to whats happening in american political history at this moment. So the way this is going to work is ill introduce the four panelists. Each person will talk for five to seven minutes or so and develop a few lines of inquiry. Ill ask a few questions based upon what people have said. And folks will have a chance to have a conversation here. But then we want to leave the last at least 45 or 30 minutes for questions from the audience. So as we go on, please have in mind things that you want to say or things you want to ask about. All right. So i want to introduce folks from my left to my right. So firs