states government in exchange for millions of dollars for themselves. change for crim a crime. itas aware of it when it happened and joe bidenit profited from it direcedt. ge it was a strong charge to make.y bertoni bob alinsky ha bdd th the document, the emailsmessaget and the text messages to prove that it happened. wehappen. we considered it a hue story and we spent an hour on it in october. oof twenty . cons still consider it a huge storylo in all of that time.ime no other no other major news organization in this countryllow has bothered to follow up.th the new york times neveriewed interviewed tonyto belinski as part of aen investigation into the biden family business deal thes, which is strange bece he was a partner with the bidenb family. but theniden neither has the washington post . neither have the other television networks. they v. e ignored it. se the fbi, whose job it is to enforce federat l law, did take a lengthy statement from tonyfrn during and during that c
what s amazing in retrospect is that two years ago when this story first broke, the usual liars and power worshipers in the media, those of whom the rare few even acknowledge that tony bobulinski existed, dismissed the story by saying, yeah, but it s biden s son and had nothing to do with biden. as if hunter biden would be able to make millions of dollars in say ukraine or china on the basis of his own expertise which amounted to precisely nothing. he never had a real job. he had no skills. how did he get so rich? because his dad was the vice president. they were selling access to the government. the money was in part going to joe biden. that was clear because hunter biden said it repeatedly on texts that any news organization could have red. tony bobulinski knew that because he saw that. he had already met with joe biden directly.
called liberty legal. now to see if you re eligible, include five seven five five three five one . what s amazing in retrospectn rs is that two years ago, when this story first broke, the usual liars and power worshipers in the media, those ra acknowledged that tony baba wolinsky existann act dismisseds the story by saying, well, e str yeah, but it sy biden s son . and nothing to do with biden. as if hunter biden would be able is if hunter biden would be able be able to make millions of china on the basis of his own expertise, which amounted to precisely nothing. he never had a real job. had n he had no skills.al job. had n how was he getting so rich? gets because his dad was a vicewas t president . that s how they were selling access to the united states government. with joe biden, his brother. and the money was in part going. to joe biden. r and that was all very clear because biden said it repeatedly on text that anedly y news organization could have read . bertoni by belinski alrea
This article is part of TPM Cafe, TPM’s home for opinion and news analysis.
While federal investigations into the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol will no doubt continue for months, next week’s Senate trial in the second impeachment of Donald Trump brings into focus the question of who is accountable for the recent assault on American democracy. While the vote last week on the constitutionality of the trial signaled how Republican senators may vote on conviction, one thing is clear: Trump did not act alone in inciting the insurrection. Without a network of organizations, allies, politicians and devoted conspiracy theorists willing to encourage and spread his lies about voter fraud, Trump’s protest would have been silenced by his campaign’s losses in court following his defeat at the ballot box. Trump’s mendacity was possible because millions of people were led to believe they could trust his word as a matter of faith.