Conventional, he said Going Forward his program is the only program allowed in this country. Competing programs are not allowed anymore. Theyre illegitimate, theyre dangerous, a threat to the republic itself. Joe biden declared that his political opponents are enemies of the state, terrorists, in fact, comparable to al qaeda on 9 11. Now biden and harris said this. They didnt say it in private, Grousing Bidderly to aides in the oval office, they said it in public on television, and didnt flinch as they did. So you have to think about the implications of this. The United States is a twoparty political system. Has for our whole lifetime. If the leader of one party, who happens to be the president , redefines the other party, not as a political party, but as criminal organization, what is he doing . Of course hes demanding a oneparty state. Thats what biden is doing. Hes using federal Law Enforcement to make it happen. So the question is, how is he getting away with it . Hes getting away with it by changing the term. Cant just openly say i want a oneparty state with me at the head. No. You have to make the other side unacceptable. He doesnt talk about voters or americans, you describes an insurgency, an armed rebellion. Trump voters, biden tells us, arent just wrong, they tried to overthrow the u. S. Government. You cant debate people like that. You have to crush that. Democrats appear to believe this. Tim ryan, running for the senate as a democrat from ohio, just yesterday, told morning joe on msnbc, quote, weve got to kill and confront that movement. Not defeat it. Kill it. Thats how dangerous populist republicans are according to the biden white house. This is the language of totallianism. Its very obvious. People in power would push back against it. Any responsible person would say, you cant do that. Thats too much power. We cant vest all the power in one political party. Thats the road to something awful. No one is pushing back. In fact, daily the media reinforces the message. Daily the media remind us that anyone who has questions about the outcome of the last election isnt a disgruntled voter. That person is a criminal. That person has embraced the big lie. You see it in every big news story, the big lie. People like that irrational and punished, and they are being punished. Yesterday afternoon fbi apprehended a man named Mike Lindell In Minnesota and seized his phone. Hes not a wanted criminal, not even a public official. Mike lindell sells pillows, especially on this channel. Why would the armed fbi agents being apprehended mike lindell . Because he questioned the outcome of the last election, questioned the big lie, a threat to the system. Thats the Consensus View in washington now. This is a very big change. In a free society, by definition, all questions are allowed. You cant have a democracy unless youre allowed to discuss its mechanics. Free speech is a prerequisite for a democratic system. Obviously. And until very recently everyone in America Unquestioningly understood that. Dissent was not a crime. It was a patriotic act. People commit it, at scale, especially democrats. For years after the 2000 election, democrats claimed that george w. Bush was not the legitimate president. Some still say it. They may believe it. Then the entire Democratic Party rejected the outcome of the president ial election. A foreign power got donald trump elected. Democrats said that. They continue to say it every single day of Donald Trumps term. They impeached him over it. Hamstrung the u. S. Government which in the end turned up nothing. You would call that the big lie. But no one was punished for it. No judge removed adam schiff from office for doubting the election results. The fbi didnt rein cnns biggest advertisers. Everyone moved on. You may have hated the russia hoax. We certainly did. But there was never any question that all american citizens have an absolute constitutionally protected right to question election outcomes. By the way, you are even allowed, maybe even encouraged, to question the mechanics of voting. Why wouldnt you question them . Voting is the means by which huge amounts of money and power are transferred from one party to another. Theres a lot at stake at the richest, most powerful country in the world. So of course americans have an absolute right to see proof, not suggestions, but proof that the system is on the level. When they are denied that right, maybe its a sign the system isnt on the level. Once again, that used to be obvious. Certainly obvious to democrats. Heres a clip you may have not have seen before. This is the current Vice President of the United States, Kamala Harris, speaking not so long ago, june 2018, about the integrity of electronic Voting Machines. Kamala harris was a senator then. Watch this. We recently actually i actually held a demonstration for my colleagues at the capitol, who we brought in folks who before our eyes hacked election machines, those that are being used in many states, but not State Of The Art from our perspective. Tucker Kamala Harris raising questions about the integrity of Voting Machines. You know what didnt happen next . The fbi didnt trap Kamala Harris at a hardees to seize her cellphone. No one in the media calls her an insurrectionist. Why would they . If you actually called about democracy, the trust in the system thats a prerequisite for democracy, you would encourage all questions from u. S. Citizens about how your democracy was administered. You had never censor those questions, punish the people who asked those questions. Ever. Even News Organizations once understood this. Not so long ago. During the trump years, cnn published a video called we watched hackers break into Voting Machines. Oh, that was allowed then. Cbs ran a report entitled how electronic Voting Machines could hack your vote. Oh, really . Did the fbi come after you at hardees . No, they didnt. Thats what News Organizations used to do. If theres corruption, well sniff it out. Were going to reassure you that your vote counts. You have to be reassured. You cant ban people from twitter and arrest them. Once again, even democrats understood that. In 2019, a couple of them. Elizabeth warren, mark warner of virginia, wrote to the makers of election systems, complaining about potential security vulnerabilities. Quote, there has been a lack of meaningful innovation in the Election Vendor Industry and our democracy is paying the price, end quote. Is that true . Honestly, we have no idea. Were not endorsing that view. Then or now. Were merely saying it is not a crime to ask. In fact, it is a prerequisite, if you want to have a healthy system, that people are allowed to ask, the people who are asked, are required to show proof to reassure them. Of course. But now democrats and the media who serve them are pretending that no one ever asks questions like this until 2020. Ever. Never happened before. Watch. This is a nation that believes in the rule of law. We do not repudiate it. This is a nation that respects free and fair elections. We honor the will of the people. We do not deny it. [cheers and applause] tucker oh, the rule of law. So the rule of law, the new law, is shut up. Right. They were telling you it was a, quote, free and fair election, about which no debate was allowed the day joe biden was certified the winner. The day. Right. Before they could know, in other words. So thats joe bidens new position. Heres the same, we checked it, this is the same joe biden, a little dimmer, but still the same guy today, back in 2019. Hes an illegitimate president in my mind. Thats it. Hes illegitimate. My biggest fear is hes going to do again with the help of vlad his best pal, and well be stuck for six more years with this guy. Its terrifying. Would you be my Vice President . Folks, look, i absolutely agree. Tucker oh, faced with an Election Denier who violates the rule of law and our sacred norms, in public, on camera. Joe biden doesnt scold her, call for the fbi to trap her at hardees and seize her personal communications device. He jokingly offers to reward her. Were so on the same page we could run together. He didnt run with that Election Denier. He ran with this one. Elections matter. When you win an election, you get to set the rules. How can you win with russian interference, though . I think hes an illegitimate president that didnt really win. How do you fight against that in 2020 . Absolutely right. Again, as a member of the Senate Intelligence community, we will believe that the russia did interfere in the election of the president of the United States in 2016. Tucker that clip is from three years ago. This is how conversation the conversation were having is right now. No one seems to remember that. It was just sunday, its wednesday, this sunday, like three days ago, that that same person, Kamala Harris, did a taped interview with nbc news and chuck todd, to explain that republicans who have the same questions about the last election that she had about the election before that should not be allowed to hold office, its a threat to the republican, theyre running for office. In other words, democracy is a threat to democracy. This is the currency of the Democratic Party, and has been for years. Lose the election. Immediately question the election. Stacy abrams, anyone . We can show you dozens and dozens of clips of this. From Kamala Harris, from hillary clinton, from jeanpierre. You get the point. This is crazy. But under joe biden the Department Of Justice appears to be doing everything it can to criminalize questions about the last election. Complain about election fraud, the fbi might show up. The dojs much broader effort, their effort is based on what they claim was a scheme to install alternate electors who would vote for donald trump in 2020 instead of joe biden. This is the core of their case. This is dojs apparent justification for crushing citizens and crushing dissent, seizing the cellphones of trump allies, including his personal attorney, which was never allowed, but they just did it. As cnn reportedly reported, the doj is investigating Donald Trumps, quote, Fraudulent Electors plot. That sounds bad. That sounds like a threat to democracy. What exactly is a fraudulent elector . Turns out that what cnn is telling you is a fraudulent elector is an alternate elector, not a new phenomenon. Theyve been around for generation. On Election Night in 1960, for example, Richard Nixon was running against jack kennedy. The State Of Hawaii appeared to be going narrowly for nixon, and they sent alternate electors to congress. They met in secret. After a recount determined that kennedy had won the state, kennedys electors sent a third set of certificates. Thats the set that the governor of hawaii ultimately certified and john kennedy became president. The question is, were kennedys alternate electors raided by the feds at hardees even though their candidate was losing . Were their communication subpoenaed . No. In Fact A State Judge endorsed what the Kennedy Electors had done. He said by turning an alternative election certificate, even when losing in the vote count, kennedys electors, all democrats, thats how the system works. After the 2020 election, trump electors in numerous states used virtually the same language as kennedys Hawaii Electors had used in 1960, but this time these were not alternate electors, they were criminals. This is part of a criminal plot to overthrow the u. S. Government, insurrectionists, trying to interfere with the real electors. As of five years ago, interfering with the work of real electors, it was your patriotic duty. Remember this . Nobody remembers anything. We have google on this show. We recall as politico reported at the time, after Donald Trumps win in 2016, democratic electors were, quote, lobbying their republican counterparts in other states to reject their oaths, and in some cases state law, to vote against trump. Democrats embraced this effort at the time. They even voted and again this wasnt in the 1860s. This was, like, 20 minutes ago. They voted to reject trumps electors. Watch. I have an objection, because 10 of the 29 electoral votes cast by florida were cast by electors not lawfully certified because they violated floridas hicks against dual office out of order. Mr. President , i object to the certificate from the State Of Georgia on the grounds that the no debate, no debate. Mr. President , i object. Under section 1517 i object to the massive voter suppression. Debate is not in order. Debate is not in order. The gentlewoman will suspend. Mr. President , i object, because people are horrified by the overwhelming evidence of russian interference in our elections. The United States code prohibits debate in the joint session. Tucker to be clear, were not endorsing that. We werent for it at the time. We probably mocked it as it happened. You can pull the tape. Its on the internet. But that was not an insurrection. That was not an insurrection, period. That was not an attempt to overthrow the u. S. Government. Neither was january 6th. Anyone who says otherwise is a liar, with motives that that person doesnt care to describe out loud, because theyre dark motives. If youre going to have a functioning country, a free society, a democracy, you have to have equal justice under the law. In that case, no democrat had his or home raided by the fbi for doing this. None of them were removed from Elected Office by judges. Its too much. And theyre so aggressive about it, and the threat of federal Law Enforcement is so omni pleasant, the few that are speaking out are a threat to the people in charge. Not simply because theyre trying to relitigate the last election. Thats over. But because theyre brave enough to say what they think. Thats the point. Theyre brave enough to stand up for their constitutional right. Kerry lake makes a good point in this clip. Watch. I dont see how asking questions about an election where there were problems is dividing a country. What i do see dividing a country is shutting people down, censoring people, canceling people, trying to destroy peoples lives when they do ask questions. Tucker yeah. Exactly. Its about free speech. At this point we may never know, and certainly partisan on both sides will probably never know till their full satisfaction all the details from the last election. What matters now is that we preserve the basic freedom in this country, the freedom of speech. In that clip, kari lake was referring to an election with record numbers of mailin ballots, with lax security requirements. Yesterday joe biden wanted to vote in his home state of delaware. De vote for mail . No. He used hundreds of thousands of dollars in public money to Fly Air Force one to delaware to vote in person. So apparently joe biden doesnt trust mailin voting. Why would he . Why would any of us be satisfied with the fact that democratic partisan Mark Zuckerberg spent nearly a half A Billion Dollars to control voting. Why wouldnt we have questions about that . Including honest democrats. Well, we would. In my opinion that cares about this country would have questions, because asking questions is not a crime, its a duty. Kari lake joins us now. I appreciate your coming on. Youve made, i think, the clearest leaving aside whatever anyone thinks about the last election, you made the clearest defense of free speech that ive seen this year. Its simple. We go back to the u. S. Constitution. I spent 30 years as a journalist. The First Amendment is darn important, and they seem to be taking that away from us right now. You described the lefts hypocrisy. You described the old saying, when theyve lost the debate, they resort to lander. Thats what were seeing right now. Tucker well, exactly. Im not in arizona, but ive sort of been following your campaign. I think you have a provocative and true things to say about immigration, but those arent covered because youre a big lie adherent. Do you believe the media uses that slur to make certain people wont hear what youre saying about the issues . Oh, for sure. If they arent badmouthing, Running Hit Pieces on me, theyll have to talk about the issues. When you look at our policies, our america first, Arizona First policies, once they start covering that, its game over, we win in a landslide, and then theyre stuck with me for eight years. I think im a nightmare for the liberal media in arizona. Tucker so your opponent this may have changed by airtime tonight, but last time i checked your opponent was refusing to debate you, citing abc news and cnn, saying shes crazy. Can she get away with that . She seems to be getting away with it. Shes raked over the coals by the mainstream media. It tells you how little her staff and her supporters think about her. They would rather her get just trashed right now in the media than show up for a debate, because they know that she has no policy to stand on. Shes