and this is fox & friends. we start with a fox news alert. three u.s. service members are dead and more than 30 hurt after another drone attack by iran-backed militants. a live report from washington as president biden says we will respond. kayleigh: a woman speeds stolen car to save her french bulldog. brian: game is set. kansas city chiefs and 49ers in super bowl lviii. it s a rematch. fox & friends starts right now. remember, your mornings are better with friends, especially one of those two teams. brian: here we go not good news. fox news alert. all eyes on the white house this see how the biden administration will respond after iran-backed militants killed three u.s. service members and hurt more than 30 in a drone attack in jordan. kayleigh: this weekend s deadly strike was the 160th attack on our troops. brian: look at that care kay since the war broke out israel and hamas. steve: madeline rivera. give us the latest. good morning, steve, kayle
would eviscerate that system. it would centralize power entirely in the white house. instead of exercising independent policy judgment on the basis of the expertise, they would be following the whims of whoever happens to be sitting in the oval office. this completely undermines the structure that we have established through experience, and through law, over the last hundred years. this is enabled us to have a stable federal government that regulates wisely. not always perfectly, but wisely, and within the limits of law. those guardrails would be completely gone. this is not an argument that is that all works perfectly in the government, or the civil service. this is an argument that it shouldn t be politicized. thanks to both of you for giving us such clarity on this. matthew seligman is a legal scholar and follow the stand for constitutional law center. jennifer reuben s opinion writer for the washington post in an msnbc political analyst, author of resistance, how women save democ
go ahead, please ask the question. that was a very honest and clarifying answer because you were talking about a policy judgment in the context of tradeoffs between different consequences. so stopping the spread of a highly communicable infectious disease is one thing that we want to do, allowing as you said society to function and obviously, you don t want everyone at the local water treatment facility to be out in quarantine with two days with none of the skilled technicians running it, for one example. correct. and i get that and i think it s a very forthright explanation, but is there any science backing up the idea that after five days of asymptoatic isolation that you re not shedding virus and contagious? yeah. nothing is 100% and this is when
isolated for five days, and then if you re still asymptomatic at the end of that five days you can go out and do your job and reenter society hopefully getting functions of society normal, but you have to wear a mask. that s the fundamental matrix of the issue. the questions arise what happens if i m go ahead, please. that was a very honest and clarifying answer because you were talking about a policy judgment in a context of tradeoffs between different consequences. okay, so stopping the spread of a highly communicable infectious disease is one thing we want to do, allowing society to function. obviously you don t want everyone at the local water treatment facility to be out in quarantine for ten days with none of the skilled technicians running it, for one example. correct. i get that and i think it s a
the biden administration anticipated this. neatly have prepared a big rollout. do you remember this? this is the headline all the way back in august. u.s. announces plan to offer boosters to all americans starting in late september. but then came the dissent. all sorts of folks of the world organization arguing that it would be unethical to give americans a third shot on many vulnerable people around the world. billions. that is an unethical argument. and i understand the doj for making. it but it s not a scientific judgment it s a policy judgment. to top vaccine regulators and food drug administration, doctor gruber, and dr. kraus, left the agency in part of the white house s booster plans according to the new york times. in an article written with other international vaccine networks of experts they claim that the data did not support giving all healthy americans booster. that supplies would be better used on the unvaccinated. they said that they were concerned about politics leading