questions that need to not just be asked but answered. that for him was i think the lesson of vietnam. in terms of iraq, i think a lot of the criticism is wildly unfair. he was not enthusiastic to say the least about the war. the speech he gave at the u.n. was totally cleared with the cia. it was the best assessment we had at the time. yes, we now know certain parts of it were wrong. there was zero intent to deceive. he didn t quit his job over this. the question of whether to go to war, again, even though he thought it was flawed, it was a policy judgment based upon the assumption that iraq had weapons of mass destruction. he did not know or favor the way we went to war. he thought that was wrong. again, it was outside his lane. he was secretary of state at this point, no longer chairman of the joint chiefs. so when i look at his performance on iraq, i think it s honorable. when i look at his career, i think it is a model.
situation, and they re wise questions that need to not just be asked but answered. that for him was i think the lesson of vietnam. in terms of iraq, i think a lot of the criticism is wildly unfair. he was not enthusiastic to say the least about the war. the speech he gave at the u.n. was totally cleared with the cia. it was the best assessment we had at the time. yes, we now know certain parts of it were wrong. there was zero intent to deceive. he didn t quit his job over this. the question of whether to go to war, again, even though he thought it was flawed, it was a policy judgment based upon the assumption that iraq had weapons of mass destruction. he did not know or favor the way we went to war. he thought that was wrong. again, it was outside his lane. he was secretary of state at this point, no longer chairman of the joint chiefs. so when i look at his performance on iraq, i think it s honorable.
committee on immunization the liberties and advises me who they believe the booster should be recommended for. that was the panel that met on wednesday and thursday. they re about four votes, and some of them were unanimous, and the one that i believe you re referring to was a split vote. okay. i don t want to get to processy, but i think it s part of the confusion because it s, like, what is their task? are they looking at the data? are they making a policy judgment based on costs and benefits? what s going into the thinking of that advisory board and then into your judgments? they pored over the data for two days. they looked at vaccine effectiveness and how it was doing, was there waning, how much waning was leading to hospitalizations. they look at feasibility. they look at the safety data and take all those data together and make a recommendation based on a vote. okay. so now let s get to the categories of people for whom
Buldan: Kadınların başına gelmiş en büyük felaket olan AKP yi yürürlükten kaldıracağız! - HABERDAR haberdar.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from haberdar.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
violations of the chemical weapons convention and other things as well. dan, i know you re a cia guy not a politician, but doesn t it seem that putin has gotten more from the biden administration than it ever got from the trump administration? well, you know, putin is relentlessly aggressive and it s up to this administration to hold him accountable and he s testing us. he tested us in ukraine and we had plans to send our ships into through the sea, and the black sea and russia s protested that and we backed down. and that gives putin the leverage to emphasize to the world that, hey, this ukraine is in our sphere of influence and we ll determine how things play out here and i think that was also an error of policy judgment on the part of the biden administration. david: well, so far if all of this is a test, i would say we get a f and they