Point cut and i think it supports a 25 point cut next week. Did you see any potential policy shifts at the debate? they had a lot of political rhetoric but not a lot of policy information. We already know were both candidates stand on addressing inflation. We ran a number of scenarios through our models to gauge what the inflationary implications are for each of the candidate policies ranging from trade, immigration, taxes and generally form a president trump would be more inflationary than vice president harris because of the tariffs which are inflationary. On top of that stricter immigration leads to tighter labour markets and stronger nominal wage growth in the united states which by extension would raise inflation a little bit. Not a lot of new information last night, just that the political focuses bringing inflation down but the policies the next few years say otherwise. Markets have been volatile. Will an interest rate cuts stabilise things? since the beginning of this year i |
That. Rate cut next week. Everyone seems to be talking about inflation because of the us president ial debate, if you watch that, did you see the potential Policy Shifts based on the candidate s . Mat on the Candidate S . Not reall , on the Candidate S . Not really. They on the Candidate S . Not really, they had on the Candidate S . Not really, they had a on the Candidate S . Not really, they had a lot on the Candidate S . Not really, they had a lot of| really, they had a lot of political rhetoric but not a lot of policy information. We already kind of know where both candidates stand on addressing inflation, i would candidates stand on addressing inflation, Iwould Run candidates stand on addressing inflation, i would run a candidates stand on addressing inflation, Iwould Run a number of scenarios through our macro model to kind of gauge what the inflationary implications are ranging from trade, government spending, taxes, generally, former President Trump would be more inflationary t
lawmaki m sick and tired of the, i m sick of it. i don t ever see this again. i don t ever want to see you again, in this condition, i m serious! i m not making this up about all of these notes. how many of these governors have we seen this doing the same dance that we ve seen today? china s house chris murphy, connecticut who has been with governor newsom, tonight, in the wake of the mass murder at sandy hook elementary school, ten years ago. senator hug, thank you joining. as you what governor newsom, there, as you know i have the strongest gun laws in the country. what more, in your opinion, can be, should be, done? well the problems, guns don t pay much attention to state boundaries, california can have strong line laws. can i could have strong laws. but the weapons across state lines. so these assault-style weapons that are used in these match outings, you can buy them in california and connecticut, what you can buy them in taxes, in georgia, and easily transport the
All, he is his watch. Hello. Welcome to newswatch with me, samira ahmed. Viewers say they want policy information, not personal insults. But has the bbcs General Election coverage already got mired in mudslinging mostly against Jeremy Corbyn . And criticisms too about how both french president ial candidates have been described on air. Although the general Election Campaign still hasnt officially started, there was no doubt this week about where the focus of politicians and broadcasters lay. All the Party Leaders were out on the stump and facing questions on a wide variety of subjects. After some pressure on the issue, tim farron of the Liberal Democrats told the bbcs Eleanor Garnier that he did not believe gay sex was a sin. I was asked the question early on and i didnt want to get into a series of questions, unpicking the theology of the bible. Isnt itjust that its your christian belief and you didnt want to admit it . No, thats not the case. What i want is to make sure that we deal
A recap of the days headlines and a look at whats in store for tomorrow. This friday night as we iron out this decision. Let me start with you. What they are saying is the Trump Administration didnt put up a good enough argument why this program should be disbanded but they said it never had Constitutional Authority behind president obama to start it and so why cant this president unwind it. A couple ways to digest this opinion. You can report that this judge is giving a stinging rebuke on the question of dac a itself, this was the judge on april 25th gave the government 90 days making it very clear if you articulate a solid reason for terminating at the board will listen carefully, they came forward after 90 days and the judge that you failed to articulate it but the last one is the key. This court is not holding that dhs can determine its program. You didnt give us the question. None of this will take until august 23rd, there will be a chance for appeal. Let me read the judges decisi