A recap of the days headlines and a look at whats in store for tomorrow. This friday night as we iron out this decision. Let me start with you. What they are saying is the Trump Administration didnt put up a good enough argument why this program should be disbanded but they said it never had Constitutional Authority behind president obama to start it and so why cant this president unwind it. A couple ways to digest this opinion. You can report that this judge is giving a stinging rebuke on the question of dac a itself, this was the judge on april 25th gave the government 90 days making it very clear if you articulate a solid reason for terminating at the board will listen carefully, they came forward after 90 days and the judge that you failed to articulate it but the last one is the key. This court is not holding that dhs can determine its program. You didnt give us the question. None of this will take until august 23rd, there will be a chance for appeal. Let me read the judges decisi
this court is not holding that dhs can determine its program. you didn t give us the question. none of this will take until august 23rd, there will be a chance for appeal. let me read the judge s decision, the court holds if dhs wishes to recent the program or take any other action it must give a rational explanation for its decision. the assertion that prior policy is illegal accompanied by a hodgepodge illogical assertions won t do it. is it their fault for not getting this right? this will be travel ban 2.0. we can t get brett kavanaugh on the supreme court he needs to be confirmed as the new justice because this case may end up very eventually. there are three legal problems, a federal law how agencies implement statutes, the administrative procedure act. when d apa, the later version of