support donald trump. he goes too far, but he says it honestly. when it comes to protecting the american people, that s also what s fueling a lot of the trump support because they re sick and tired of that level of, well, we re going to talk all over and hear this but lollygag and there are there are also to be fair where he blurs the truth. absolutely. i m not a trump supporter. i m using it as an example of why people are so upset. it s a fair point. tara, angela, thanks so much. that s it for us right now. the news continues right after this message. the only way to get better is to challenge yourself,
wasserman schultz is about staying on message no matter what almost to the master. but she s a madam of staying on message almost to the point of ridiculousness at times. so you understand angela the way politics works especially for committee chairmen. they re going to sit there and say, yes, we support the will nominee. that s the political answer. i really don t believe he ll be the nominee. but i m saying listen, we ve all covered politics. but when you tear up the talking points and say, listen, this is a bridge too far. i know you correctly cite i sat there and watched paul ryan very explicitly say, this violates our constitution, violates the law. we saw dick cheney in no uncertain teams say this is damaging. almost all the republican candidates say the same. but the party is the party. eventually it s got the accountability. when do you tear up the talking points book and talk about lines in the sand. this is a line too far?
the investigation by the fbi. initially, they were not know ing whether it was a work-based thing or something cause d by te radicalization, and the more information they get, the more it looks like this is going back years and years and missed. the fbi director talked about this, and this is how he can describes what he knows about the radicalization. san bernardino involved two killers who were radicalized for quite a long time before their attack. in fact, our investigation to date, which i can only say so much about at this point, indica indicates they were actually radicalized before they started court i courting or dating each other online, and online as late as, as early as the end of 2013, a they were talking to each other about jihad and mar terdom before they were engaged and then lived together in the united states. we believe they were inspired by foreign terrorist organization, and work ving very hard to
the two rifles that you brought up, the ar-15s used in the attack in 20111 and 2012 and shortly a afterwards he turned them over to farook, but he never reported that official transfer ownership which is by the way against the law here in california. but at this point, marquez has not been charged with anything, and investigators are saying that he is cooperating and at this earlier stage, it does not appear that head knowledge or involvement in the terror plot. jim? ana cabrera following it all at the scene of the horrible shooting there in san bernardino. i want to turn it over to the testimony of ashton carter who was on the hill to testify about the organization. he concedes that the terrorist organization is not contained and telling the senate armed services committee that momentum for isis is building and that u.s. forces will prevail. the reality is that we are at war.
that is how the troops feel about it, because they are taking the fight to isil everyday, applying the might of the finest fighting force that the world has ever known. however, the chairman of the comm committee, senator john mccain pressed carter for more specifics on the success of the administration s strategy. i urgently and fervently ask you for a strategy that you can tell us when we are going to be taking mosul and raqqah and wipe out this caliphate, and frankly, i have not seen it. and pentagon correspondent barbara starr joining me. barba barbara, senator mccain and others are frustrated on both sides of the aisle frustrated by what they say is a lack of ur jen si by the obama administration, and how does secretary carter respond to the criticism? well, he is going back to the point that he felt that they were gaining momentum, building momentum, and that is not what the committee wanted to hear. they wanted to hear a plan, a