wasserman schultz is about staying on message no matter what almost to the master. but she s a madam of staying on message almost to the point of ridiculousness at times. so you understand angela the way politics works especially for committee chairmen. they re going to sit there and say, yes, we support the will nominee. that s the political answer. i really don t believe he ll be the nominee. but i m saying listen, we ve all covered politics. but when you tear up the talking points and say, listen, this is a bridge too far. i know you correctly cite i sat there and watched paul ryan very explicitly say, this violates our constitution, violates the law. we saw dick cheney in no uncertain teams say this is damaging. almost all the republican candidates say the same. but the party is the party. eventually it s got the accountability. when do you tear up the talking points book and talk about lines in the sand. this is a line too far?