trump/russia collusion hoax. i m harris faulkner and you are in the faulkner focus . deliberations resumed just this morning. a guilty verdict would put more evidence behind former president donald trump s claims that he was unfairly targeted by the f.b.i. an acquittal could raise doubts about the legal merits of durham s entire investigation. former attorney general bill barr. i think whatever you think of trump, the fact is that the whole russia thing was the grave injustice. i believe it is sed i shallous, whether it can be proved in court as a crime in one issue but people are coming to see what actually happened. harris: ranking member jim jordan is in focus. let s begin with david spunt live at the district court in washington david. special counsel john durham began his investigation into trump-russia narrative three years ago. we re still on verdict watch. the jurors are looking at a single charge f.b.i. false statements case. they passed a note to the judge
That was the only person i could think of. Prior to working for the yurt council worked for Ranking Member nunes, is that right . I only found that out after the fact. I wondered why i was being asked about him, so i looked it up. You cautioned us on dangers that members of this committee pedaling any Conspiracy Theories that could benefit russia, i want to ask if you heard the nameless parness who was questioning Rudy Giuliani about the Conspiracy Theories. Are you aware he was indicted october 10 for making foreign contributions to republicans in u. S. Elections . I am aware of the reports, yes. Are you aware of yesterdays daily beast story reporting the indicted Ukranian Parn as is working with nunes on his overseas investigations . I am not aware of that. I ask unanimous consent to put in the daily beast story from yesterday. First two paragraphs reading lev parnas, indicted associate, helped arrange calls. Nunes aid derek harvey participated in meetings which were arranged to help
it is so for the lottery commission to make sure you have the right ticket. i mean, resource and knowing where things come from is so basic i would think. the january 6th committee. i was going to say the fundamentals were the clinton campaign paid perkins couey and it was lie after lie after lie and they peddled it to the media and f.b.i. the three years they put the country through and the three years that donald trump got so much accomplished for our nation. imagine what else he could have got done for the united states and american people but for the ridiculous efforts that the democrats started with a lie and secretary clinton. harris: i pointed to the taxpayer money but it is also the time and what needed to get done in between then and now. i ll move to this. the january 6 committee holds
the whole operation. it wasn false. it was garbage, but it was a conspiracy to keep donald trump. the white house in durham is a on to him and he wants tond make sure the court has the truth and the facts plain and simple .ce and you ve commented recently on fox news .com about a lot this jason chaffetz and you mentioned to me, a number of conversations, the name mark alias. what does he have to naoo with us? well, mark elias is in the center sorry. a lot of controversies along the way. yeah, the way e this works, the scheme is the dnc and hillary clinton pay a lawc firm in this case perkins couey and the person who s overseeingg this is marc elias working for him is this michael sussman. and what they do is and theto reason they do it is to be able to claim attorney client privilege and that you can tou see it. but millions of dollars i are flowing. i thinkk one of the interesting things that will start with this case, which starts a week from mondayy on the 16th is how much money was
democratic national come it i paying perkins couey, the law firm that was heading up efforts they go through this allegation is that they said, hey, you know, we don t know who we re working for, forths had nothing to to with campaign, but it has followed the money, i think you will see durham has a strong case, you follow the money, if they are in there hacking that campaign, white house, donald trump, the healthcare provider, trying to potentially going after ton to know s medical records, stuff like that. not only should tech firming held liable but prosecutor add well, there are people who should go to jail, america is fed up, they have total the one i hold