Voting, we have to weigh those risks. Absolutely. And at least the agreement in front of me limits the risk. It is a completely unlimited risk. You may be right. They wont do that. What if youre wrong. What if in fact they will. There is a hard line as you pointed out in teheran. They are licking their chops to see this agreements falling apart. I think from all of the elements in iran they want this agreement because it is so good for them economically and it strengthens their position in the middle east. Doesnt do anything to stop them from supporting and in fact it helps them support their proxies throughout the region more than now. I want to agree with you that i cant predict whatll happen. I cant predict with certainty anymore than anybody can whatll happen if Congress Rejects the agreement. I can just say from what i have seen this morning and based on what i saw come out of lozan in april, this disagreement has more risk for the u. S. And more reward for iran than i hoped it wo
This deal . Do you support it . Are you opposed . You can also send us a tweet. Or tell us what you think on race book. Com the phone lines are open so start dialing in. Atlanta journalconstitution says here are the details those are some of the details of the Iran Nuclear Deal. What do you think, should congress support or oppose the president on this . Christina peterson talks about the review process by congress. Lets begin with yesterday and the initial reaction from Republican Leadership who control both the house and the senate floor agenda. Guest Republican Leaders made very clear yesterday that they are not going into this with great optimism, that this will be a deal they can support. They were sharply critical of announcing justin that upon further expansion inspection if the deal is what they think it is, they will try hard to block it. Host how would they do that much . Guest the bill has 60 days in congress for review and by the end of that which will probably be when they
You can resite the litany in which they are justified that unfortunate conclusion. The one way to have confidence in the agreement is if the verification inspections provisions of it were air tight anywhere, any time but they are not. They create a whole negotiating process, as we said, 14 days, 21 days, appeal to a board. It is an invitation to the iranians to on advice kate and if they are caught with something wrong to get the time to get it out of the view of the international inspectors. In the area of in spectors whatever you are inspecting giving notice to whoever you are going to inspect always allows them to hide or fix the problem before you get there. It seems to me with 24 days, would you be able to hind the grand canyon or something. I find that as a problem. Big picture is it still the policy of iran today to destroy the United States . Well, until we hear otherwise, i think we have to say it is. And israel as well. And israel. And now you notice that last fridays demonst
Later. Every month, every year, that is why we need you so badly. To demand elected officials confront the truth. More jobs will be created that eliminating the damages of Climate Change and mitigating them. Then will be kept by not doing anything about it. Same with immigration. I recently had the opportunity to meet with lee kwan you before he died. He was the president of singapore, a brilliant guy who wrote extensively on the future of india china, the United States and russia. He recently passed away. I was coming from mumbai india to meet with abahbed, and i got a call from singapore, what i sit down and meet with kee lee kwan yu. We were talking about how rapidly she has consolidated power in china. We were talking about how quickly she consolidated power in a said about five minutes into it, i said mr. President what are the chinese doing now . Meaning what are they contemplating next . And he said they are in the United States. They are looking for the buried black box. I look
Learn, just like donna said, to learn a new trade. Host in 1985, 6 . 7 billion worth spent on corrections. 2013 26. 5. Caller this is not what i talked about but since you brought up i will address it quickly it is not necessarily that we need more women, because the kind of woman that would shoot unnecessarily is the same kind of man, it is not gender, it is a mental tap. It is not that we need more women, but more certain types of people. What i called about is the bulk of the problem is the sixmonth to threeyear sentences people are getting and that is primarily because of the flexibility fake hero judges and prosecutors are being given that they should not have are two examples i would like you to address. I do not believe it is rational anyone should be locked up for any on of time if they were not paying money to a court for supposedly the wellbeing of a child i have a false promise of Child Support. It will not give productive value to that childs life for that person to be sitt