Equity review this project has been delayed to undergo reviews for five years now and im concerned that the equity impact of those delays is not even being considered at all because every day that this project gets delayed and more housing is not filled and these 1 billion in Community Benefits is not paid to the city, its a day that people will not live with shelter and the city will face a budget crunch. Furthermore, i want to ask the board of supervisors as we look through racist planning, why i havent seen proposal to up said the west side westportal Saint Francis wood, these are white and exclusionary neighborhoods with Single Family zoning right next to money munitations that e you in the train in 15 minutes. As we look a lot i support the removing the central free and it should be a part of this broader shift towards equity and planning and zoning. Thank you. You will be notified you have been unmuted and you may begin your comments. Caller hell oh i would like to express my sup
Their specific comments. They reviewed the findings that we have and we had a series of conversations about the specific legislation and discussing things that could be made from zoning and land use perspectives and then some of the things that would require further investment and discussion with other city agencies. Thank you,. Sure. The specific changes are, expanding the boundary in which impacting money can be spent to provide funding for projects in the adjacent neighborhoods. Broadening the membership relative to the first, that is the existing boundary of one mile . Currently, the funds, the infrastructure funds can be spent in the planning area or within 250 feet . Ok. Broadening the membership of the market activity cac, allowing a land dedication option for Affordable Housing requirements in the adjacent neighborhoods and new requirement to support Community Serving use thats the groundfloor. Expanding the unit mixed requirement and new general plan policy to apply a racial a
Be turned around within 72 hours but were seeing back ups especially with our provider labs and some of our own labs within the city. We are backing up seven days, ten days at this point. Thats something were seeing across the state and across the country. thank you director. Thank you madam mayor and dr. C olfax for your time. Any followup questions or questions after this meeting can be directed to dem press at sf dot org. Thank you for your time and that concludes todays press conference. Concludes todays press good afternoon welcome to the land use and Transportation Committee San Francisco board of supervisors for today monday july 20th. Im the chair of the Committee Supervisor aaron peskin joined by supervisor ahsha safai and dean preston and joined by colleague supervisor Hillary Ronen. Do you have any announcements . Due to the covid19 emergency to protect board members, City Employees and public, board of supervisors legislative chamber remain closed. Committee members will at
Which is very different from the Big Government point of view. That San Francisco enjoys. Thank you very much. Now, this conversation has been great but we do have to have our final remarks now. Marcy, i like to start with you. Okay, thank you. Let me wrap up with just what we were thinking about in our meetings. We were saying, okay, the idea, for example, the legislation says that the employees may not have the Financial Resources to stay home on unpaid leave. Yes, thats right. None of them out there do. Its not just the City Employees. Another thing would be for example, it helps [inaudible]. We have a huge amount of people already in government. We dont need to attract any more. Again, speaking from the libertarian point of view. It helps with prosperity. Well, you know, you kind of have to look at the big picture. The big picture will tell you, the more benefits you give, the higher the ability for one group to spend more money while the other group spends less. So, we have not ac
Shopping until they find one that will tell them what they want to hear that [speaker not understood] is better, not what the law and the facts dictate, which is that the maintenance alternative is better and will cause less impact on the environment . The open space Contingency Fund is for acquisition of new park space. Its not a slush fund for [speaker not understood] produce a report. Its not a slush fund to pay for a change in gardening at sharp park which is what a lot of the restoration proposed really is. More importantly, the proposed restoration at sharp park is an implementation of plans in the [speaker not understood] before the eir has been complete. We really cant implement whats in the plan before the eir has been finalized and that point should have been made with fish and wildlife. So, im very concerned about the idea of this third consultant and we have a fourth one and [speaker not understood]. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker. [inaudible]. Good afternoon. My name i