law at oxford. he came over in the gilded age, kind of a toteful-like trip, and he looked around and he said an american president would only endanger the constitution with the masses, not against the masses with the masses. and so, everybody watching has to make up their mind here whether the facts will lead them to a natural conclusion or whether they want to make a counterfactual, a nonfactual conclusion. this is about we the people today. all of it, though, through the lens and the filter of an increasingly tribal nation with this party cleve right in the middle of the population. sure. and my argument would be that we ve been divided perennially, right? patriot versus torrey, north versus south, segregation versus
have a third person, we have always divided into two. patriot versus torrey, federalist versus anti-federalist, north versus south, republican versus democrat, now dump versus notru normal people. i think it will be hard to have a third-party president. i think one of the parties reconfigures itself so radically that an incompeteindependent pe the embodiment of that party. willie. i m just looking here. sarah sanders the press secretary in the white house stated the president will hold a press conference at 11:30 in the east room of the white house. i would say preempt everything and put out the tax returns. why not? that s a great idea. he might as well. i m wondering what state for you last night was the one that really told the tale? was it virginia? virginia was the first sign for us that the house was going