law at oxford. he came over in the gilded age, kind of a toteful-like trip, and he looked around and he said an american president would only endanger the constitution with the masses, not against the masses with the masses. and so, everybody watching has to make up their mind here whether the facts will lead them to a natural conclusion or whether they want to make a counterfactual, a nonfactual conclusion. this is about we the people today. all of it, though, through the lens and the filter of an increasingly tribal nation with this party cleve right in the middle of the population. sure. and my argument would be that we ve been divided perennially, right? patriot versus torrey, north versus south, segregation versus