Evaluating indications of Global Restructuring and the extent of taxation. In 2010 and 2011, we saw the report on task risks regarding tax losses, and you saw reports in 2011 about the need for transparency disclosure and a 2012 report on hybrid mismatches dubbed theon 2 was us. This never resulted in the political call to action we are seeing now being played out in a number of jurisdictions. Nor did the prior initiatives received a fraction of the attention that has been the hallmark of the bep initiative. Whoy most Tax Professionals might be able to cite letter and verse of the action plan never noticed or worried about the prior reports or initiatives and thought they were of immediate concern. Why now . What is new . It is not the oecd that power and influence are, what is the power behind the movement . Environmentolitical and the public and political environment, largely outside the United States, that really launched the oecd initiative into what it is today. We know a number o
Caption content and accuracy. Visit ncicap. Org] the presenceon on of race in this cycle, coming up. 10 45, the president speaks to graduates of Howard University at a ceremony in washington, d. C. Booktv has 48 hours of nonfiction books and authors every weekend. Here are some programs to watch for. 1 30, booktv is at the 13th annual black writing conference in new york. Discussions onel hip on, gender, as well as panels on diversity and writing programs and black writers in the digital age. At 7 30, a Pulitzer Prize examinesistorian Thomas Jefferson from early influences to political ideology. On sunday night at 9 00, afterwards with peter marks, author of good for the money. He discusses how a former cbo theved the company after 2008 crisis and made the Company Become profitable again. He was the only person who thought this was possible, essentially. The government did not this was going to happen. The company certainly did not think this was going to happen, and the American Peopl
Lists of minerals and strategic and critical, they differ from time to time and because of economic conditions. They do infer a supply chain which marc is going to get into here a little while. They also, infer that there is foreign imports either partial or total. So that is of interest to us. And there could be severe economic repercussions if, for shortage of Critical Minerals and of Course National security concerns tells you that mineral is strategic. This is, as i said, one of the best probably sources on the topic and again, the definitions are a little squishy but they say that there are minerals that actually dictate the Economic Health of the nation or Strategic Minerals will always be critical, but Critical Minerals will not always be strategic, okay . Now, here the different metals and element involved in both classes and you can read that. The books get into it in detail. I dont want to belabor too much today. Notice Strategic Minerals include rare earths. Fissionable mate
Implement encryption where the products make sense to include encryption. Yeah. Agent littlehale, as you know, when the Police Search a home or business, officers will provide a copy of a warrant authorizing the search. This might reveal the basic type of investigations whether it involves terrorism or drugs or medicare fraud, but the police dont have to say anything more. Im told Law Enforcement has serious concerns about a provision in the lee leahy bill that changes the notice provisions to require Law Enforcement to go beyond that, potentially divulging specific investigative detail to a target. Do you share these concerns about in this bills notice provisions . Why or why not. We do, mr. Chairman. Because we are both concerned that providing greater protection for evidence because its in digital form is in fact not bringing digital evidence in line with evidence in the physical world. And also because when a search warrant is executed in the physical world, we control the access t
Things like that potentially unininvestigatable if the target has done a good enough job of hiding his other traces. If we believe that be the case, we wouldnt take the position we have. Our belief is the civil agencies with the tools they have can veth. It is our belief that the type you have to be arguing in order for that to be the case, you have to argue theres no case in which access to information by direct request to the Service Provider contributed in a material way to an investigation . I think its difficult to be categorical in a hypothetical situation. So i would not want to say that. But i will say i think we think on balance, balancing the law the needs of Law Enforcement with the privacy here we believe that the best the best outcome to this is that the civil agencies work with the tools they have rather than extending this new power to them. But you agree and accept that a contested Court Proceeding in open court with the target of the investigation present is a more rig