Preventive healthcare, rise in chronic diseases, aging population, convenience and accessibility offered by self-testing kits are some of the key factors fueling the market growth.
going on then, because i always felt i knew i didn t do it. so therefore it s impossible for them to prove you ve done something you haven t done. with no evidence, nothing but a bunch of rumors, ghost stories and smoke screens, i didn t think there was any way in hell they were going to be able to get away with that. our investigators were obtaining dna samples in the form of hair, cigarette butt, oral swabs from people who had some connection to the events. these included samples from several people, including steven branch s stepfather, terry hobbs. we gave all these samples to thomas fedor, who is here today. he is an independent serologyist. the result of that analysis in may 2007 showed a hair from a ligature used to tie up michael moore could be associated with terry hobbs. the biggest bombshell of the new defense investigation is that an unexplained hair that could be from another victim s
innocent. yet there s just something about them that says, you know, you re still hiding, you re still running, you re covering it up. you ve said this lie so many times you believe it now. but with mike it was different when he spoke to me, i m innocent, i just believed him. i just believed him. there is no scientific basis for timing death based on stomach contents alone. all of the medical literature then and of course now says that. dr. bayardo didn t see the body until it was too late to do a rigor mortis or livor mortis analysis. so he did this stomach contents analysis. and it was probably on the basis of that stomach contents junk science that michael was convicted. from the autopsy were vaginal swabs, oral swabs, fingernail clippings. so we had those tested thinking that will reveal the assailant.
you ve said this lie so many times you believe it now. but with mike it was different when he spoke to me, i m innocent, i just believed him. i just believed him. there is no scientific basis for timing death based on stomach contents alone. all of the medical literature then and of course now says that. dr. bayardo didn t see the body until it was too late to do a rigor mortis or livor mortis analysis. so he did this stomach contents analysis. and it was probably on the basis of that stomach contents junk science that michael was convicted. from the autopsy were vaginal swabs, oral swabs, fingernail clippings. so we had those tested thinking that will reveal the assailant. and so the results were all coming back negative, negative, negative. in february of 2005, we filed
you ve said so many lies you believe it now. but when mike spoke to me and said i m innocent i just believed him. i just believed him. there is no scientific basis for timing death based on stomach contents alone. all of the medical literature then and of course now says that. dr. byers didn t see the body until it was too late to do a rigor mortis or liver mortis analysis. so he did this stomach contents analysis. and really it was probably on the basis of that stomach contents junk science that michael was convicted. from the autopsy with vaginal swabs, rectal swabs, oral swabs, all the usual stuff, clippings, we were having those things tested thinking that would reveal the assailant. and so those results were coming back all negative negative negative. in february of 2005, we filed our first motion.