innocent. yet there s just something about them that says, you know, you re still hiding, you re still running, you re covering it up. you ve said this lie so many times you believe it now. but with mike it was different when he spoke to me, i m innocent, i just believed him. i just believed him. there is no scientific basis for timing death based on stomach contents alone. all of the medical literature then and of course now says that. dr. bayardo didn t see the body until it was too late to do a rigor mortis or livor mortis analysis. so he did this stomach contents analysis. and it was probably on the basis of that stomach contents junk science that michael was convicted. from the autopsy were vaginal swabs, oral swabs, fingernail clippings. so we had those tested thinking that will reveal the assailant.
you ve said this lie so many times you believe it now. but with mike it was different when he spoke to me, i m innocent, i just believed him. i just believed him. there is no scientific basis for timing death based on stomach contents alone. all of the medical literature then and of course now says that. dr. bayardo didn t see the body until it was too late to do a rigor mortis or livor mortis analysis. so he did this stomach contents analysis. and it was probably on the basis of that stomach contents junk science that michael was convicted. from the autopsy were vaginal swabs, oral swabs, fingernail clippings. so we had those tested thinking that will reveal the assailant. and so the results were all coming back negative, negative, negative. in february of 2005, we filed
you ve said so many lies you believe it now. but when mike spoke to me and said i m innocent i just believed him. i just believed him. there is no scientific basis for timing death based on stomach contents alone. all of the medical literature then and of course now says that. dr. byers didn t see the body until it was too late to do a rigor mortis or liver mortis analysis. so he did this stomach contents analysis. and really it was probably on the basis of that stomach contents junk science that michael was convicted. from the autopsy with vaginal swabs, rectal swabs, oral swabs, all the usual stuff, clippings, we were having those things tested thinking that would reveal the assailant. and so those results were coming back all negative negative negative. in february of 2005, we filed our first motion.
the basis of that stomach contents junk science that michael was convicted. from the autopsy with vaginal swabs, rectal swabs, oral swabs, all the usual stuff, clippings, we were having those things tested thinking that would reveal the assailant. and so those results were coming back all negative negative negative. in february of 2005, we filed our first motion. and we sought dna testing on the swabs from christine s body. we asked for the bloody bandanna found 100 yards behind the house along what we always believed to be the escape route of the murderer to be dna tested. john bradley was the district attorney of williamson county at the time we filed the motion for dna testing. so i called up mr. bradley and i introduced myself. and i tried to explain to him the logic of what we were doing,
there is no scientific basis for time and death based on stomach contents alone. all of the medical literature then and of course now says that. dr. bayardo didn t see the body until it was too late to do a rigor mortis or livor mortis analysis. so he did this stomach contents analysis. and it was probably on the basis of that stomach contents junk science that michael was convicted. from the autopsy were vaginal swabs, oral swabs, fingernail clippings. so we had those tested thinking that will reveal the assailant. and so the results were all coming back negative, negative, negative. in february of 2005, we filed our first motion. and we sought dna testing on the swabs from christine s body. we asked for the bloody bandanna found a hundred yards behind the