And 15 minutes. All persons having business before the court of appeals issued by the columbia circuit are to give their attention for the court is now sitting. God save the United States. Case number 195331. Committee on the house of representatives. Versus donald mcgann. [indiscernible] good morning. Good morning. May it please the court. The House Judiciary Committee seeks to serve an implied cause of action to enforce the subpoena to compel mr. Mcgahn to testify regarding his duties as white House Counsel over the objection of the president of the United States. Regarding his duties as white House Counsel over the objection of the president of the United States. Dispute over institutional prerogative bears no resemblance to the cases are controversies that could be heard under article three. Moreover, while congress has purported to authorize senate in fact, for that reason. Is there a more fundamental question now . The article three question . Article three standing and federal m
Not for the first time, tonights speaker, thank you for helping us keep the conversation aloft in down all. The program can be viewed in its native habitat on crowd test and facebook and youtube pages, those who want to watch with Close Caption go to youtube, the cc button in the bottom of the player and the video will be available for rewatching immediately following podcast. The presentation will allow 30 to 45 minutes. After words he will take your questions, please up in your questions using the apps button on crowd test and neil shubin will take them at the end of his talk. Cant guarantee what he will get to every question but we will get to as many as possible. Maximize your time. Science and society, include a look at the nuclear site featuring bob ferguson and Tom Carpenter but Anthony Townsend on the future of driverless cars. And the uw science series, by grad students, by michael shermer, jillian andrews, that is not true, kurt bloodworth, tomorrow evenings program, samantha
Supreme court going to shut him down this week tomorrow they are going to say, were also making it illegal to wear suits that look like trash bags sorry, my man. President trump tweeted today about former National Security adviser john boltons new book and said, quote, wacko john boltons exceedingly tedious New York Times book is made up of lies and fake stories, said all good about me in print until the day i fired him. A disgruntled, boring fool who only wanted to go to war and never had a clue, was ostracized and happily dumped what a dope. Okay, but everyone already knew that, and then you hired him trumps like a mcdonalds manager who puts a golden retriever on the register and then gets mad about the long line it was never going to work in the new interview, former National Security adviser john bolton said, he believes that putin thinks he can play president trump, quote, like a fiddle i dont know fiddles are notoriously hard to play if anything, putin is playing trump like a dru
Draw near and give their attention so the court is now sitting. Be seated, please. Case number 195331 committee on the judiciary of the United States house of representatives versus Donald F Mcgahn 2nd appellate. Good morning, your honor. May it please the court. The House Judiciary Committee seeks to assert an implied cause of action to enforce the subpoena to compel mr. Mcgahn to testify regarding his duties as white House Counsel over the objection of the president of the United States. This interbridge dispute over institutional prerogatives bears no resemblance to be against nonfederal officials, congress enforce subpoenas against federal executive officials asserting executive prerogative objections and what gives the senate statute. How does that help us think about the constitutional issue and stability issue. I think it does in two ways, your honor, first, we have a straightup subject matter jurisdiction argument because of the senate statute. But the second point, if you rule
May it please the court. The House Judiciary Committee seeks to assert an implied cause of action to enforce the subpoena to compel mr. Mcgahn to testify regarding his duties as white House Counsel over the objection of the president of the United States. This interbridge dispute over institutional prerogatives bears no resemblance to be controversies under article 3 and moreover, while congress has purported to authorize senate commutes to enforce certain subpoenas against nonfederal officials, congress itself has expressly carved out the authority of the senate to enforce subpoenas against federal executive officials asserting executive prerogative objections and what gives the senate statute. How does that help us think about the constitutional issue and stability issue. I think it does in two ways, your honor, first, we have a straightup subject matter jurisdiction argument because of the senate statute. But the second point, if you rule that theres no authority, this court can avo