interested in chico or interested in just being part of this effort, i would love for you to do that. you can go to muddy paws rescued.org on how to adopt foster, or just donate. thank you so much for joining us. we ll see you tomorrow night, seeing a news night with abby. phillip starts now the lesson, donald trump hasn t learned. that s tonight on good evening. i m abby phillip in new york and tonight, political revenge is now the republican party s policy. governor larry hogan, dare to say that the rule of law deserves to be respected and for that it s now put them in the crosshairs of his colleagues and that three-letter committee that is supposed to be in charge of helping him win in november does the republican national committee support larry hogan for senate well, i ll tell you one thing. i don t support what he just said there. i think it s ridiculous and i think anybody who s not speaking up in the face of really something that should never again have seen the lig
lesson here that revenge is a dish that you are supposed to serve to the other guys, not to force feed to your own political party joining me now is former montana governor mark roscoe. he s also the former chairman of the republican national committee governor. thanks for joining us tonight. when you hear donald trump s daughter-in-law, lara trump, who s now the head of the rnc saying that larry hogan doesn t deserve the respect of anyone in the republican party. and what goes through your mind well it s incredibly, it s contemptuous, it s rude and inappropriate. larry hogan is for anybody any conversation anywhere, but particularly when you re talking about politics and our democracy, larry hogan is distinguished office older. he was elected in a democratic state strongly democratic state. he was widely respected by virtually everyone who worked with so at the end of
center for political and economic study is joining me now. spencer i m going to start with you and the roberts decision and i m going to read something to you that he said. it seems like he s living in a different world than the rest of us. he said, spending large sums of money in connection with elections but not in connection with an office older s official duties does not give rise to quid pro quo corruption nor does the possibility that an individual who has access to political parties. i think it s obvious from every day experience that may be a strong legal opinion but it s a flawed realistic theory. it s a flawed realistic opinion as well. citizens united, the old citizens united case, it basically allowed corporations to spend on elections. it also led to the creation of