If motion stay we ask that you deny it. Thank you. Thank you ill give you five minutes for rebuttal. I want to address a couple of quick points. Whatever den says about looking at counselor decisionmaking does not suggest we look behind National Security determines made by the president that determination four corners of determination are based on the congressional determination that the country at issue is of different. I thought you were using den and mandel as your now youre saying its distinguishable, are you relying on those cases or not . We are relying on them for the limits that the Court Reviews this issue. Im adding when you have a document itself and thats best evidence of intent of the president relies excluively on the cause made by congress by the safety concerns presented by the countries at issue that is the end of the inquiry and should be. The fact i know counsel for the other side cited this Court Car Danous Decision and they in dedescribing the state of the Law Cour
and his top advisers to allow us to go forward on that claim. mr. riff can, how do you respond to that? let me point the post co gent notion that federal judges are equipped to second-guess performed on basis of objective allegation had the same intelligence. we re talking about discretionary judgment. what are limits of the president s power in this case, what the limit? if it was out right ban could he get away with it? it is not a muslim ban. if it were in principal it would be establishment clause, first amendment issue. i have a problem that states