If motion stay we ask that you deny it. Thank you. Thank you ill give you five minutes for rebuttal. I want to address a couple of quick points. Whatever den says about looking at counselor decisionmaking does not suggest we look behind National Security determines made by the president that determination four corners of determination are based on the congressional determination that the country at issue is of different. I thought you were using den and mandel as your now youre saying its distinguishable, are you relying on those cases or not . We are relying on them for the limits that the Court Reviews this issue. Im adding when you have a document itself and thats best evidence of intent of the president relies excluively on the cause made by congress by the safety concerns presented by the countries at issue that is the end of the inquiry and should be. The fact i know counsel for the other side cited this Court Car Danous Decision and they in dedescribing the state of the Law Cour
substanive interpretations. one the guidance from the white house council is defen tifr interpretation of the order. and the white house speaks for the president in this context. on the page of 11 we had suggestion for the kind of order that would address the harms idea by washington. and i m going to read it. at most injunction should be limited to the class of individuals on whom the states claims rest. previously admitted aliens temporary abroad now or wish to travel and rirn return to the united states in the future. that s the core of the harm. when we re talking about an injunction entered on prelim