tonight with the context, political analyst dahlia schneidlin, and the former federal prosecutor joe moreno. hello, welcome to the programme. under the united states constitution, everyone has the right to the fifth amendment. but for many years, donald trump held a particular view of those who invoked it. so, they have five people taking the fifth amendment, like you see on the mob, right? you see mob take the fifth. if you re innocent, why are you taking the fifth amendment? fifth amendment, fifth - amendment, fifth amendment. horrible. horrible! but today in new york, he refused to answer any questions under oath, pleading the fifth. the former president had been deposed in a civil case brought by new york attorney general, letitia james, who is investigating whether the trump organisation inflated then deflated the value of its prized assets, its golf courses, its skyscrapers, to deceive the lenders and the tax authorities. in a statement soon after, mrtrump said. joe,
the president will profoundly accept the nomination for president of the united states after being nominated. i profoundly accept this nomination for president of the united states. [cheers] greg: it is happening. yeah, the raid was a real smart move. you want to take a larger-than-life character and make him even larger? you raid his house. they just gave pop a 55-ounce can of spinach. they saved hunter biden s high-speed internet access. he just gave me a book of 1000 and one jokes. because the raid not only angers republicans, it energizes them and it energizes donald trump. on unlike all the other shows we actually have tape and footage of the raid. greg: it is wrong, but you have to keep your sense of humor on this for a reason. part of the strategy is to get you to react. so that they can then cover your anger as danger. the press has already been sounding the alarm over the pro-trump message boards and they are ready to go, they say. so don t get mad. ins
country is headed. not this hit and run stuff, not to cherry pick but a more folsom understanding, william jacob son with a great web site, this pairnk gave sums it up for me: so this garcie paragraph sums it up for me: what about the united states? this got mde to thinking. in between our elections, a lot happens to this country s tothat is not subject to elections. no longer subject to representative government. did you support the hiring of 87 thousand new irs agents? was that on a boot ballot, the disruption of energy independence? and complete attack on theepen c combustion engine and automobiles that usene? gasoline? did yo u support somehow, or vote for open borders where fentanyl and illegall im immunity and ms-13 and drugg car at the time cartels our can operate freely? did you votede forr. or support or hear about a massive debt? a massive debte like the planet has never seen on top of regular spending? that would affect inflation the way it does. did someone r
search broke. let s go outfront. and good evening. i m erin burnett. outfront tonight, the breaking news. new details just in about why the fbi searched trump s mar-a-lago home. cnn learning tonight that investigators grew increasingly concerned that trump or his lawyers had not turned over all of the documents and other materials that were government property. officials also came to believe that trump s representatives were not being completely truthful when it came to the documents trump may have had in his possession. according to the washington post, the fbi also removed about a dozen boxes in monday s search. and it comes as new details are emerging about the lengths the fbi went to to keep the search under wraps. a search tells our whitney wild the secret service only had a one-hour heads up before the fbi showed up to execute the search warrant. only one hour. a source tells cnn that secret service agents validated the warrant, they met the fbi agents. they
even questioning how this came to light. merrick garland was getting creamed in the pr war as trump repeatedly slammed the search as a break-in, but the attorney general felt he couldn t publicly respond. so justice department officials made hair case through leaks their case through leaks which violate the rights of a potential defendant who hasn t been charged with anything and may not be. they made garland s case from a behind a curtain of anonymity. a poll-up piece in the washington post cited people with direct information. as an ethical matter, the leaks are indefensible. i m howard kurtz, and this is mediabuzz. howard: ahead, we ll question senior white house adviser gene sperling on the fierce debate over the president forgiving college debt for millions. that new york times story triggered a media explosion, especially the part about donald trump repeatedly holding on to documents so sensitive they could only be seen in a secure government room and a deep s