Not Sondland News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Not sondland. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Not Sondland Today - Breaking & Trending Today
President , correct . Its appropriate for the Justice Department and the Prosecutor General to cooperate and to exchange information, yes. But to the extent that the president has concerns and to the extent that the Attorney General is having u. S. Attorney durham look into it, isnt it entirely appropriate for the president to flag this for president zelensky and say that you should be in touch with our official channels . Mr. Castor, i dont know the precise appropriateness of these kind of relations. Now, were you involved, either of you involved with the preparation for the 7 25 call . I was not. I was not. And how do you account for that . I mean, you were the two of the key officials with responsibility for ukrainian policy. If the president of the United S ....
Government and the Justice Department, thats the perfect way to raise an issue with the ukrainian president , correct . It is appropriate for the Justice Department and the prosecutor again to cooperate and exchange information, yes. To the extent the president had concerns and the Attorney General is having u. S. Attorney durham looking into that. Is that entirely appropriate for the president to flag this for should be in touch with our official challenge . I dont know the precise appropriateness of these kinds of relations. Now, were you involved, either of you involved in the preparation for the 7 25 call . I was not. I was not. How do you account for that . I mean you were the two officials responsibility with ukrainian policies. If the president of the united
states having a call with the leader of ukrain ....
Assistance. no linkage? there was not there was not discussion of linkage. three meetings, face to face, with president zelensky, no linkage. yet, in your deposition, you said this and you said it again the first hour of the majority. my clear understanding was security assistance money would not come until president zelensky committed to pursue the investigation. my clear understanding was they weren t going to get the money until president zelensky committed to pursue the investigations. now with all due respect, mr. ambassador, your clear understanding was obviously wrong. because it didn t happen. president zelensky didn t announce he was going to investigate burisma or the bidens. he didn t do a press conference. and say i m going to investigate the bidens, we are going to investigate burisma. he didn t tweet about it. and you just told the ranking member he didn t do the cnn interview and announce he is going to investigate burisma or the bidens. so three face-to-face mee ....
Quid pro quo, if president zelensky did not clear things up in public, we would be at a stalemate that was one point. it was also the case. mr. morrison talked to you, right? no. ambassador sondland also told me that he recognized that it was a mistake to have told the ukrainians that only the meeting with the president and in the oval office was held up on the in order to get these investigations. no, it was not just the meeting. it was also the security assistance. that is everything. so those two those two discussions. i understand. okay. all right. again, just to recap. you had three meetings with president zelensky, no linkage in those three meetings came up. ambassador linkage didn t announce he was going to do any investigation to the bidens or burisma before the aid was released. president zelensky, excuse ....
i believe so, yes. now, you testified in your opening statement i do not believe the united states should ask her countries to engage in selective politically associated investigations or prosecutions against opponents of those in power. because such selective actions undermine the rule of law regardless of the country. the selective politically associated investigations or prosecutions of opponents against those in power, are you referring to the bidens there? i m referring as a general principle about the promotion of the rule of law. but that would apply to the president of the united states seeking an investigation of his political opponent. would it not. it could be interpetraeused that way, yes, sir. and i take it in your discussions ambassador taylor with ambassador sondland or others whether a was communicated to you that the president wanted investigation into the 2016 and the bidens not ....