Live Breaking News & Updates on Not Discriminatory
Stay updated with breaking news from Not discriminatory. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Court Rules Realtor's Claim That "Jesus Loves You" Is Not Discriminatory thenewamerican.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from thenewamerican.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
(File photo) MANILA - The Court of Appeals (CA) has declared unconstitutional a series of local legislation passed by Mandaluyong City, collectively known as the Motorcycle Riding-in-Tandem Ordinances. In a 26-page decision dated Sept. 28 and penned by Associate Justice Raymond Lauigan, the appellate court's Fifth Division reversed and set aside the July 2020 decision of the Mandaluyong regional trial court (RTC) Branch 212 in the case filed by Dino de Leon for violation of Ordinance 550,S-2014; 515,S-2015; and 694,S-2018. In reversing the Mandaluyong RTC, the CA said the subject ordinances are "unconstitutional because they are oppressive and go beyond what is reasonably necessary for the accomplishment of the purpose that the City of Mandaluyong aspires." The ordinances, the court added, "arbitrarily limit the movement and mode of transportation of male back riders even though there is no direct link or available statistical data presented to show that motorcycle r ....
A Lausanne, l'école 42 continue son expansion internationale à vitesse grand V usine-digitale.fr - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from usine-digitale.fr Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
MONTOYA RESPONDE A PRENSA OFICIALISTA Y LAGARTA Diario Expreso expreso.com.pe - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from expreso.com.pe Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
The court struck down the part of the voting rights act which says that certain states and counties that have a history of racially discriminated voting restrictions, they need to get any changes to their voting procedures pre checked by the justice department to make sure those changes aren t discriminatory. big parts of north carolina were covered by the preclearance sections of the voting rights act, but when the supreme court struck down that portion of the act, north carolina republicans pounced and they radically moved to restrict voting in the state. because they finally could. now, though, something really interesting is happening. because even though we no longer have the part of the voting rights act that makes states have to get clearance to know that their voting changes aren t going to be discriminatory, we do still have the part of the voting rights act that says the justice department can sue a state after the fact. so once the state has already implemented discriminator ....