well for the blogs. yeah,work that s it. okay, it was my not life not going well. no, nong, no.ne i was thinking of someone else. it was blog butat y you re doing great now you know i can tell by your logo that you re trying to confuse it. put the logo up. you re trying to confuseot viewersba with monday night football, right? yeah, definitely some that and you re definitely courting people into sports and. i don t like to sit and watch w sports . anybody that likes toik sit,esnt i want them to watch exactly on a scale of zero to 100% what will be the percentage of red meat versus the percentage of seat no. it s a hard news show. we re no opinion, no opinion. just going to be hard news coverage. my advice to you is to go i hope no one took that seriously back . thereri will be a lot of red meat. so i had my red meat. i m saying things that i care about. exactly because you are king ofu red meat. ou
in the russian investigation. we have learned that robert mueller has interviewed the president s long time friend tom barrack who is a person with first-hand knowledge who says that interview took place in december of last year, and he was asked extensive questions about campaign manager paul manafort and his deputy rick gates. and also, the the special counsel robert mueller s team was challenged in a court appearance by paul manafort friday seeking to have the federal bank and tax fraud charges against him dismissed. the u.s. district court ts ellis said that you don t care about the bank fraud, but what information mr. manafort can give you that could reflect to mr. trump to lead to the prosecution, or tim peachment or whatever, andt president trump reacted to the comments right after. i have been saying for it a long time. it is a witch hunt. and then, none of that
and am bbassador crocker, thank you for being with us, and you have written a letter of support of the iran nuclear deal, and lay out the case as we are preaching this self-imposed deadline and why should the u.s. not remove itself from the deal. thank you for having me, david. laok, a perfect agreement? no. no ne fwoesh yated ing ee eed -d agreement is perfect for all of the parties m. this case, i don t know about the nuclear physic, but people i know who are expert in the field say it is a pretty good arms control agreement. but it is not a treaty of peace and friendship which is some in the obama administration attempted to portray it as. it reminds me of the reagan years, and president reagan negotiated salt i and salt ii with the soviets and those were pretty good arms control agreement as well. salt ii never went into effect,