as inhumane and savage and those videos live top the description. it started an january 7 when memphis police officers pulled over nichols. i didn t do anything. you guys are doing a lot. if you don t lay down. i m on the ground. on your stomach. reporter: body cam video shows an officer aggressively yank nichols out of his vehicle and the 29-year-old tells officers he wants to go home. a few moments later you see nichols escape from police and they then tase him as he takes off down the road. at that point, officers chase him. later on other officers spot him and catch up to him. you see nichols on the ground as officers restrain him, punch him and pepper stray him. all the while the officers demand he give them his hands as nichols calls out for his mother. mom! mom! mom glock reporter: even though it appears officers have hold of nichols arm, the assault continues and at one point an officer coming and kick nichols in the head two times as if he was punting a foo
dana: why did the administration let it spend days floating over sensitive military sites? among those pressing the pentagon for answers is montana senator john tester. say yes or no. did we know what they were trying to collect, yes or no? yes. we think we know what they were going to collect, we don t know. that scares the hell out of me. we are building our understanding of what capabilities they have. i have a problem with the chinese balloon flying over my state, much less the rest of the country. mike: president biden down playing the incident. president biden: it is not a look, it is totally violation of national law, our airspace. once they come in our space we can do what we want with it. mike: we begin with bryan llenas off the coast of south carolina where the salvage operation is moving forward. good morning, bryan. good morning. the f.b.i. says a majority of the chinese spy balloon remains underwater spread out in two separate sections in
regarding the grant termination. does that violate policy? it was inappropriate for him to go doing that for a grantee as a conflict of interest, among other things. on march 29, 2021, dr. morens edited a letter that dr. das yak was sending to nih. does that violate policy? yes. he provided him with advice regarding how to mislead nih on eco health s late progress report. does that violate policy? it was wrong and inappropriate and violated policy. on december 7th, 2021, dr. morens wrote to the chair of eco health s board of directors to quote put in a word, end quote, for the doctor. does that violate policy? should not have done that. that was wrong. it violates policy. i m not sure of a specific policy. i imagine it does. he should not have been doing that. in addition to all those actions dr. morens wrote to the doctor peter from tony s recent comments to me they are trying to protect you, end quote. did you ever talk to dr. morens about dr. daczak and e
funded research on the surveillance of and the possibility of emerging infections. i would not characterize it as dangerous gain-of-function research. i have already testified to that effect a couple of times. you are saying no, correct? in his may 16th i m saying no because i ve said that multiple times including the transcribed interview. in the may 16, the nih director said i can tell you that the failure of the wuhan institute of virology to provide us with the data that we requested and the lab notebooks that we requested certainly impeded our ability to understand what was really going on with the experiments that we ve been discussing this morning. my question to you, dr. fauci, if the nih didn t inspect the wuhan institute of virology and nih didn t receive the lab books
concur with that. mike: a lot of house republicans frustrated by their inability to get answers. a committee has subpoena power and be able to dig and get experts of all political we are suasions and nonpartisan experts like the 9/11 commission. we learned a lot through the 9/11 commission and just listening to this clip you just played, i and others have a lot of frustration that the nih didn t have complete transparency into the work. it was minimally funding at the wuhan institute of virology and at the same time they may be correct that the work that it knowingly funded couldn t have led to the pandemic but we have no idea what work was being carried out at the wuhan institute of virology. nobody at the nih knows that. we don t know what viruses were held in their repositories or what work was done or who was