available to respond to real-time needs and circumstances, so i think that worked out well and as these contracts occurred periodly we have to reforecast knowing what we know now and that is this moment in timet. u rs will hold the masterer contract but not sure we will use all the money? the current modeling oror forecast needs adjustment. this is a extension of-we only have 3 engineerfelt i don t think thats the problem. i don t think anyone is questioning the need for the pmpc service. we are very much a outsoersed operation. i think maybe the concern and what i didn t-maybe i missed but didn t see in the staff report is how much of this budget augment ation is because spending at a higher rate anticipated which is director kim s concern versus we need to keep them up i running for 6 more months to clous out the contract and thought i understood it was a compation of both but i don t think we have visibility fl to that distinction and think there is concern over the
sfgovtv, charles kremenak who make our meetings available online, as well as transcript. madam clerk, any announcements. please silence all cell phones. thank you, madam clerk and can you please call the first item. item no. 1 is ordinance amending the environment code to adjust the incentive in the solar energy incentive program. the author of this item is president london breed, if you would like to make opening comments. yes, thank you i know we have laurie mitchell here who will be making a presentation shortly, but i just wanted to make a few comments about your go solar program in the city. we re making a few technical amendments to this program today. despite the fact that other utilities around the state are ramping down their incentive like the city of palo alto and silicon valley, for example, i m happy to see the go solar program in the city is still going strong and that we as a city are continuing to invest in incentives like this particular program. we
item eleven, and just a couple of announcements, i made this announcement at a cultural heritage committee meeting a few minutes ago. in the february 4th, chronicle, there was an article entitled preservation falls flat, and he made a suggestion about possibly creating plagues to talk about the outside of the building to talk about the stories inside the sense of place and i thought that that was a really good idea. and possibly food for thought, for this commission to take up further with the planning department staff to see if we can somehow encourage that. second thing is that there was an e-mail that was forwarded to me today about the california arts council creating the cultural cultural district, asking for a letter of interest from various organizations as well as local businesses to become part of their pilot program to further acknowledge diverse and cultural resources, to identify high concentration of cultural resources and activities thought that it would be a gr
that later. sure. we will move on to commission matters. yes. very good, commission matters item three, president s report and announcements. item four, consider of adoption for the minutes arc july, 20, and the draft minutes of hpc february first, 2017 hearing. commissioners anything for comments? all that i have to dredge my memory. we transscribed the comment letter from the staff on to here and we are probably waiting for that. i thought that was mine. okay. does any member of the public wish to comment on the draft meeting minutes on wednesday, july twenth for the review committee or february first, for regular hearing? do i have a motion to adopt the minutes? motion to adopt? second. thank you, commissioners on that motion to adopt the minutes to the july, 20th, and the regular hearing for february first, 2017. commissioner haus? yes, johns, yes. matsuda, yes. highland. yes. and we move the commissioners passes seven to zero. xh is that wil
the subject matter description, with respect to agenda items it will be afforded when it is reached, each member may address the commission for up to three minutes,vy no speaker cards. does any member like to speak on a non-agenda items. seeing and hearing none we will close comment. that will place us under the department matters, director s announcements. mr. fry is not here at the moment, so maybe we will reopen that later. sure. we will move on to commission matters. yes. very good, commission matters item three, president s report and announcements. item four, consider of adoption for the minutes arc july, 20, and the draft minutes of hpc february first, 2017 hearing. commissioners anything for comments? all that i have to dredge my memory. we transscribed the comment letter from the staff on to here and we are probably waiting for that. i thought that was mine. okay. does any member of the public wish to comment on the draft meeting minutes on wedn