jail. that is, unless this man can save them that s attorney david shown who will speak to live in just a moment. look, it s been what, two years now since bannon was convicted of contempt of congress for defining a subpoena from the january 6 committee. remember that his excuse back then, his lawyer at the time, robert costello, remember him from the hush money trial. one witness is calling the defense. while the time he said i didn t have to comply because he thought trump would assert executive privilege he didn t and bad, it was apparently on notice of that fact as well we have been appealing his conviction ever since that time and up until now, the judge in this case had been kind of holding off on the sentence. but today the judge said enough, there was no legal reason left to delay that sentence. we told bannon he has to report to prison then on july 1st, to serve a four month sentence outside the courthouse, steve bannon was see bannon but i want to say something spec
today and i want to ask you about what has been described as a pretty heated moment between you and judge carl nichols after there he ordered bannon to report to prison next month. you objected. obviously, you are as council and the new york times is reporting that judge nicholls responded in a way that let him, you know, he wasn t too thrilled with the response saying one thing i need you to learn as a lawyer is that when a judge has decided you do not get up and yell at them. look, i know you re an advocate for your client explain your reaction. were you surprised by his decision to order him to go to jail shocked by it. it goes against everything that he has said in this case. judge nicholas found substantial questions for the appeal, said twice at ben and should not be serving his time while the appeals process runs. the appeal process has not run. there s nothing about the panel decision that change that. judge nicholls said that the definition of willfully used in this case c
initially charged what we known as the gilgo four. we said we weren t going to stop. we said we re going to we re going to investigate the body he s on the beach as well as the bodies and suffolk county in general, we ve done that and the indictment of for the charges pre-training to ms castillo and ms taylor are the fruits of those labors. we re going to continue. we re not going to stop. he had property. i understand. other areas of the country. is there a coordinated effort to also have investigations in those areas as well? yes. i have jurisdiction in suffolk county as part of the task force we ve accumulated a mass amount of evidence with regard to this defendant and we collaborate with all of our partners in all the jurisdiction when do you think the trial in this case might take place? you mentioned over 300 different smart devices. is there a sense of when this trial might actually happen? well, one of the things that we have is a tremendous amount of evidence. we also ha
that this panel, the court of appeals panel, hands were tied. the government acknowledged it. the government argued to them, you don t have the authority to overturn like a vole. nothing changed. he should shouldn t have changed his bail status. listen, it s not such a major event in the sense that all he could have done was let him out on bail until rehearing a rehearing on bonk is decided in this case, what he did though is cut the top, pull the rug out from under him because he has to file now, he s going to send a person to prison, who he himself has said didn t comply. who he himself has said was convicted under a definition of willfully that simply is not consistent with the law. we don t do that. there s no reason to send him to prison now, let this case play out. this is a misdemeanor. i hear you, david. and of course, the judge disagrees and believes there s no more legal recourse in this action and that willfulness and that lack of only case we re talking about seemed to st
and then you could transmit we re to a third party. i think the theory and our allegation in this case is with regard to all six of the murders at all of the people close to the defendant were out of town or out of the house during the time of the commission of the murders. so which gave the defendant to perfect form some of the acts which we allege. where were were listed in the planning document i mean, this was a married man with children. the idea that this would have been committed, possibly hit this evidence found in the home allegedly. i mean, the timeline here, i mean, some of these murders and some of these bodies this had been committed over decades, and frankly, it s been a year since even heuermann himself was arrested in that house, was searched multiple times why do you think it took so long to get this planning document and other evidence to come to light. so we my office, you know what i occupied the office beginning in 2022 we we formed