Man in the american west, most of the land is public land. Its owned by all of us. This is nonowhere more true in e lower 48 thahan in nevada, where close to 90 of the land is owned by the federal government. Its owned by us. Chisisholm partrticularly in nevada, so many people are oriented t to spendingng time on public lands, whether you hunt, you fish, you just enjoy it casually, you horsebackride, youre a rancher, youre a miner, youre a farmer. Whoever you are, you spend time out on your public lands, and its an amazing part of our legacy, and its something that really distinguishes the United States, distinguishes nevada as a great, great place to live. Baca one of thehe beauties of nevada is that we have thesese millions and milillions of a acs ofof public lands, but sometimes thisis can lead d to conflicts,s you have g generations of people who come throuough and engage eh ththe land in different ways. Br [applause] nancy pelosi today we unveil a portrait of one of the greatest l
Mining and ranching interests. Tv reporter the town of ely cod experience the most impacts from the gat basin naonal park. My resides lieve thathe parks popularity could spill over into ely and rejuvenate an otherwise dormant economy. Christensen when he heard that there was support for a national park, he saw a solution. Reid i was willing to compromise significantly. Laxalt didnt kill it. Im sure he uld have, buhe didnt. Because of him, i made it smalr than it should have been, and i also allowed grazing ont. Cows d sheep uld graze there. I got it passed, and so there was talk about the seetary of agriculture at that time. Was recommending to president reagan to veto that. Ronald reagan democrats and republicans must join together not to do whats easy, but to do what is right. Reid so i called william penn mott, the director of park service, and i said, mr. Mott, theres talk about vetoing my park. How do you feel about it . He said, i, as a young park ranger, was asked by one of the
Many different walks of life. Some are. Oddly tried but all of them come straight from the heart to see and when theres no more delusional school. From the finish of the law to their final resting place the russians g. W. Documentary. European officials tell china the books economys a not a plaything for beijing. Needs to be a. Norths. Rhetoric a thump that in the china summit beijing proves its economic might with new industrial numbers out today. Its already cost b. W. Billions now dilate greens to a major settlement to seal claims that cheated on diesel emissions tests in the us. Will continue to kill the color theyre using as europes summer comes to an end how restaurants going to cope when they considine is outdoors. And it was all a lets do business there is more data out today showing the chinese economy is recovering fast from the corona crisis in august industrial output grew by more than 5 percent thats the fastest growth in. Months at the same time retail sales have grown fo
Vote vote the presiding officer are there any senators in the chamber wishing to vote or change their vote . If not, the yeas are 92, the nays are 4. And the nomination is confirmed. Under the previous order, the motion to reconsider is considered made and laid upon the table. The president will be immediately notified of the senates action. The presiding officer the clerk will report the motion to invoke cloture. The clerk cloture motion we, the undersigned senators, in accordance with the provisions of rule 22 of the standing rules of the senate, do hereby move to bring to a close debate on the nomination of john w. Holcomb of california to be United States district judge for the Central District of california. The presiding officer by unanimous consent, the mandatory quorum call has been waived. The question is, is it the sense of the senate that debate on the nomination of john w. Holcomb of california to be United States district judge for the Central District of california shall
A Lasting Impact on American Society. This class is about an hour, 20 minutes. All right. So today were going to talk about america during the First World War. And ive called this lecture americans at war the myth busters edition. And i did that kind of intentionally. Because when we think about understanding the First World War in general, there are so many myths and misconceptions that are attached to the war that its really interesting for us to first understand why those myths exist and then to unpam them a little bit and think more about the reality of the experience, right . I want to start first by talking about how this connects to the First World War overall. So its not just america that has these myths, but even this sense of how we understand the First World War to begin with. And we think of the kind of general narrative that we attach to it. One of the most common narratives is that world war i was a senseless slaughter. Right . Weve already talked about the uncertainty as