Nancy Gerdner News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Nancy gerdner. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Nancy Gerdner Today - Breaking & Trending Today
Time. You fight until we can continue to achieve what is right and just for everyone of all backgrounds, all religions and all genders, and ways of life. Thats what the great people like Nelson Mandela stood for. We cant just choose to be good. We must aspire to try and be great. That does it for me. Thanks for watching. Ill see you back here tomorrow at 5 00 p. M. Eastern. Up next, the beat with my friend ari melber. Bob mueller revealing Michael Cohens crimes, as well as new details on his ties to russia with federal prosecutors in new york dropping the hammer and calling for substantial prison time. Lets get right to it, two major Court Filings out tonight, one from bob mueller who says that Michael Cohen has been helpful in his russia investigation and, from these ....
Million.st and all this has led to increasing calls for democrats to perhaps slow down the impeachment process just a bit to try to compel bolton and others to testify.ngto i m joined by former u.s. district judge nancy gerdner, o senior lecturer at harvard law school. and u.s. attorney chuck rosenberg and msnbc contributor. let me start with you as a former federal district judge, what the law says about absolute immunity, compelling testimony f from people from various of mick mulvaney to pompeo in the light of yesterday s decision by a federal judge saying mcgahn does have to testify. there was nothing surprising about that decision. every other witness that is ever subpoenaed to a court or to congress has to appear, then they can make their claims about this privilege or that privilege, but they have to appear. they have to work in the door and sit at the table and describe you know, and answer the questions they can answer, raise issues with respect to questions they can answe ....
And all this has led to increasing calls for democrats to perhaps slow down the impeachment process just a bit to try to compel bolton and others to testify. i m joined by former u.s. district judge nancy gerdner, and a former senior fbi official and u.s. attorney chuck rosenberg and msnbc contributor. let me start with you as a former federal district judge, what the law says about absolute immunity, compelling testimony from people from various of mick mulvaney to pompeo in the light of yesterday s decision by a federal judge saying mcgahn does have to testify. there was nothing surprising about that decision. every other witness that is ever subpoenaed to a court or to congress has to appear, then they can make their claims about this privilege or that privilege, but they have to appear. they have to work in the door and sit at the table and ....
As too much evidence. and so i understand the political imperative. i understand why democrats feel they need to move quickly. i would just prefer to know everything.to and if i can t know everything,i i would prefer to know as much as i could possibly know. and if that means tapping on the brakes slightly, that makes sense.on and oh, by the way, chris, i don t really care if a witness has an r or a d after their name. if they re telling the truth i d like to hear it. and this goes back to argument bolton s attorneys are now making. b and after all some of his deputies have already come before the committee and given h their testimony.he often it s testimony about bolton, about bolton s concerns, about bolton instructing them to go tell the lawyers.lt and, nancy, their lawyer is holding la while the mcgahn ruling has nothing to do with him, but he s a former official who has his subpoena withdrawn, i believe. but presumably a subpoena would fall under the exact same legal ....
That he was not already pleading guilty to, and that should bring us right back around to the trump organization investigation that they re still conducting. nancy, i m thrilled we have the benefit of your expertise tonight because this is now going right into judge lane. how does a judge take these two very different recommendations? mueller saying basically he lied but he helped, you figure it out. and the sdny saying this is a bad dude. he is a criminal, he s a liar, he thinks he s, quote, above the law and should get about four years. what does the judge do? the judge will have two alternatives. on the one hand, this is going to be driven by this is a train driven by the prosecution. because it s the mueller part that is the big question mark. right, if it were just the sdny part, then, you know, ....