whether somebody knew that something within can happen. all of a sudden they set him in a semi- stocks because i know that the stock will go down. and that you can t do that. though serious legal ramifications. we will have to see what happen i know the story is breaking th wall street journal writes the following coding the investigations are examining stock sales that silicon valley financial officer as it made it days before the bank failed. the justice department probe involves the departments of fraud prosecutors in washington and san francisco. is there a need to pin this on somebody else a? is someone else going to get penned with this? i m not surprised at the justice department has launched an investigation. you have to ask it, did svb go under because of some kind of malfeasance? was there lying going on? was their misrepresentations to the market. think about this of the federal government is investigating
transpired or what was in the account. what money transferred to him t get more information from that standpoint. it s interesting jonathan turley writes the following. many democrats and legal expert have objected that influenced peddling is my crime. however, it is corrupt and squarely within the oversight oversight authority of congress indeed if it is not a matter fo criminal charges such congressional action may be the only way to force accountabilit for corrupt efforts to sell influence and access. the whole problem and a lot of republicans are upset about this . it does not seem to be any consequences against anybody fo anything. we saw the ridiculous hearings at last week where it does not matter free speech as it taking off the board. it does not seem there are consequences. do you think there will be in this case? gasset. one of congress as core functions as oversight. watching how the taxpayers mone is spent.
the railroad promised to commit some $20 million. twitter files at tonalistic .ie be as a blasted house democrats and a new piece over what he calls their disaster wa a miscalculation on. this follows his recent testimony before a committee of the weaponization of the federa government. let s talk about that with kati th jason brasa. it s always great to see you. matt ty uber be as looking in this whole thing and he writes the following. he writes that many democrats and legal experts that s not th right one. they saw a threat people who wrote about true stories of vaccine side effects. or true posts which could field feel hesitancy. if people transmit true or possibly true stories, that conflict with approved at narratives that these acts are algorithmically detected as intended it to deceive and thro in the crime baskets.
see some of these lawmakers and they are just that are readily ignoring the first and nobody cares about the first amendment and your people need to get ove this and move on. i sat there with my eyes like this and thinking are we kidding ? they really have given up on th first amendment. it s not important. it s an inconvenience it. they only support the first amendment and our right to free speech when we are saying the quote unquote right thing. what i found rather humorous honestly, a lot of the democrat lawmakers on their twitter accounts in posting these video from the committee hearing. they were bragging about what they were doing. when you watch the video and hear what they say, they were making the argument that we no longer have first amendment rights. we better shut up and do what they say. by the way, millennial s essay middle age is not what they were promised. they say it s not what they wer promised. new york times has the following . when they published a bestselle
we knocked it down. it was doing something the russians don t like and that a risk we take. if i m hearing hearing new clear, you are saying it s not mistake. it s not an anomaly. you believe it s kind of at russia provocation provoking is a bit. it could be. in fact i think there is good chance that is one of the state department officials i believe it was told the washington post earlier tonight these kinds of interceptions over the black se are common. these things have been going on for a long time. for whatever reason they decide there can take action and potentially either try to ramp things up a bit and put us at a difficult situation or perhaps push us back further to make it more difficult to get intelligence. i don t think it was an accident . the russian defense ministry said the following quoting as a result of the short maneuver, the mqm nine drone went into