Cooperateo proceed as if i wasnt here for the first argument so let me focus on whats dferent about texas. One thing thats different abxas is its definition of social media platforms excludes website. Wean put the gmail issue to one side when lkbout texas. It also excludes websitesor and. In the First Amendmentusess we call that contentbased discrimination. Thatsnef the reasons this statute is unconstitutional. The other thg thats different is that iso respects this statute operates more simply because it f clines from engaging iviewpoint discrimination. Were edo thinking that viewpointiscrimination is a bad thing and the government shouldnt do it. Do it it is a bad thing. When editors of speakers enga in viewpoint discrimination that is their first amendntight. It is also absolutely vital to the operation of these websites because if you have to be viewpot neutral that means suicideyou have materials that prevention you also haveo ve materials that advocate suicide promotion. Or if yo