Live Breaking News & Updates on Military Construction Authority
Stay updated with breaking news from Military construction authority. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Sooner, that s going to be a moment where many senators are going to be worrying about history and how history will talk about them and how much they re willing to protect the institution of congress as it relates to this grand and glorious democracy that s served us so well all these years. let s listen to the president s top adviser on immigration and border issues, stephen miller yesterday on fox news, trying who apparently has not been able to find any precedent, even, no matter how hard he tried, for what the president has done here. can you name one case where a president has asked congress for money, congress has refused, and the president has then invoked national powers to get the money anyway? well, this current situation just yes or no, sir? the current situation pertains specifically to the military construction authority. i m just asking, has there been a has congress asked for money for military construction, congress said no and he then ....
Money, congress has refused, and the president has then invoked national powers to get the money anyway? well, this current situation just yes or no, sir? the current situation pertains specifically to the military construction authority. i m just asking, has there been a has congress asked for money for military construction, congress said no and he then the meaning of the statute, chris, is clear on its own terms. if you don t like the statute or members of congress don t like the statute you agree the answer is no, there hasn t been a case like this? it doesn t seem like they did a lot of homework on this. no. you know, if the president could just go get some other money when congress didn t give him the money he wanted, this would happen all the time. but as you laid out in your opening, there s this one minor inconvenience called article i section ix that says that congress controls the power of the purse. so there s a reason this doesn t happen. and pres ....
Name one case where a president asked money for congress, congress refuse and the president then invoked national powers to get the money anyways. the current situation. yes or no, so. the current situation pertains specifically to the military construction authority. congress asked for money for military construction. congress said no and he then the meaning of the statute, chris, clear on its own terms. if you don t like the statute, or members of congress don t like the statute. the aenser is no. the premise of your question is false because congress has appropriated money for construction of border barriers consistently. this is a part of a national security they ve never done this under a national emergency they declare a national emergency to promote democracy in belarus in zimbabwe. didn t you take money that congress refused to appropriate. they didn t refuse to appropriate. they passed a law specifically saying the president could have this authorit ....
Steven miller on the musunday shows. it got pretty feisty. can you name one case where a president has asked congress for money, congress refused and the president has then invehicloked national powers? the current situation yes or no. the current situation pertains to the military construction authority. i m asking . congress said no and he then many t meaning of the statute is clear on its own terms. if you don t like the statute, or members of congress don t the answer is no? there hasn t been a single case like this? how important is precedent here, danny? precedent is critical. the key case is the case called youngstown where president truman tried to nationalize the steel industry during the korean war declaring a state of national emergency. the supreme court ultimately struck down trumanen s attempt to take over the industry, saying that when the president ....
Military construction authority. i m just asking the broader question when it comes to military construction, congress said no and then the meaning of the statute, chris, is clear on its own terms. if you don t like the statute or members of congress don t like the statute the answer is no. they would have changed it a long time ago. you know the white house is losing when they can t defend themselves on fox news. the appearance on chris wallace yesterday for the proof the trump s national declaration to build the border wall is a political ploy and loser at that and one he intends to keep up for his campaign. quoting trump and his allies are attempting to make 2020 a repeat of 2016, centered on a portrayal the nation is under siege from criminal forces and reliant on older whites in rural areas. jeremy and the table are back. the politics of this seem to me ....