Each speaker will be allowed up to three minutes. When you have 30 seconds remaining, you will hear a chime indicating when your time is almost up. When your allotted time is reached, i will indicate that your time is up and take the next person to speak. Best practice is to call from a quiet location, speak clearly and slowly, and mute volume on your computer. I would like to take roll at this time. [roll call] clerk thank you, commissioners. First on your agenda is consideration of items proposed for continuance. Items 1a, b, and c for case numbers 2019000494 dnx, cua, and vnr are proposed for continuance to september 4, 2020. Item 3, case number 2019016388 cua, item 4, case number 2019017022 cua, is proposed for continuance to october 29, 2020. Further, commissioners, under your regular calendar, item 10, case 2019021010 cua at 717 california street, conditional use is requesting a continuance to november 11, 2020, and item 19, is requesting a continuance to october 1, 2020. I have
Equity review this project has been delayed to undergo reviews for five years now and im concerned that the equity impact of those delays is not even being considered at all because every day that this project gets delayed and more housing is not filled and these 1 billion in Community Benefits is not paid to the city, its a day that people will not live with shelter and the city will face a budget crunch. Furthermore, i want to ask the board of supervisors as we look through racist planning, why i havent seen proposal to up said the west side westportal Saint Francis wood, these are white and exclusionary neighborhoods with Single Family zoning right next to money munitations that e you in the train in 15 minutes. As we look a lot i support the removing the central free and it should be a part of this broader shift towards equity and planning and zoning. Thank you. You will be notified you have been unmuted and you may begin your comments. Caller hell oh i would like to express my sup
Their specific comments. They reviewed the findings that we have and we had a series of conversations about the specific legislation and discussing things that could be made from zoning and land use perspectives and then some of the things that would require further investment and discussion with other city agencies. Thank you,. Sure. The specific changes are, expanding the boundary in which impacting money can be spent to provide funding for projects in the adjacent neighborhoods. Broadening the membership relative to the first, that is the existing boundary of one mile . Currently, the funds, the infrastructure funds can be spent in the planning area or within 250 feet . Ok. Broadening the membership of the market activity cac, allowing a land dedication option for Affordable Housing requirements in the adjacent neighborhoods and new requirement to support Community Serving use thats the groundfloor. Expanding the unit mixed requirement and new general plan policy to apply a racial a
Needs or just feedback overall from our English Learners. As you can see from the presentation, there was definitely higher, you know, urgent requests from e. L. S and what that means for our work this fall, especially taking off, again, with this initial recommendation of Distance Learning in the fall or at least the first, you know, as they kick off the new academic year. Hi. Ill try that, devon, and you can jump in if you want. What i think you hear you seeing, commissioner lam, is how are we using this to address some of these call programs Going Forward with these English Learners. That was the first part of the question. The second was do we have this aggregated data around some of these English Learners, and some additional framework, particularly, like, our e. L. S in high school. Some people, i know, had to call four, five, six times, and just, like, how does that guide our work forward with e. L. S im sorry, work with English Learners . So with our work on the data, we dont h
Two, two year options to extend. Were only asking for one twoyear option to extend. And before we exercise the final twoyear option to extend, we would evaluate if there were Civil Service employees who i believe chair fewer were concerned would be laid off or have been laid off if they could do the services in step . I totally get that. What im saying is that rather than the airport having the ability to have the second twoyear option at its sole and absolute discretion and suggesting and with all respect to my budget chair, that this only be one twoyear extension rather than the unenforceable language that is being suggested by the budget chair. What is before you is one option to extend. Before we exercise the second option to extend, we would come back to the wards for approval and presumably to present what we have reviewed in terms of if there were other Civil Service positions that could perform these jobs. So are you coming back to the board because pursuant to section 9. 118,