quote, between fox news and tucker carlson. it had to do with information that came to light in the dominion case. here is the headline. on eve of trial, discovery of carlson text sets off crisis atop fox. private messages sent by tucker that had been redacted showed him making offensive remarks that went beyond the comments of his show. in a moment, the attorney for fired carlson producer grossgrossburg joins she. she s alleging sexism, a hostile environment. her attorney said the special prosecutor has descriptions of her recordings and they want them. with us, oliver darcy. lay out reporting about what led to the breaking point. what we are reporting is that there was a late break in terms of what fox s board of directors knew about redacted portions of the tucker carlson emails that were going to be at issue in trial. some of your viewers might remember there with emails from tucker that were controversial. these redactions were more concerning to the board and senior l
at least they put their line in the sand, their marker down, which is a very important thing when you look forward in negotiations. that s what you need to do to actually start negotiations in ernest. time is running out. we are talking about june. it s the end of april. how big of a test do you think it was for speaker mccarthy navigating the factions of his conference? i talked with some republicans before coming on with you, some of which are not huge kevin mccarthy fans, who said they felt not only heard, which is what nancy mace said publically after she changed her vote, but also that kevin mccarthy and his top allies, top lieutenants like congressman emmer, they did negotiate this in a way that allowed them to allowed members of the conference to feel heard. that s the same kind of language
have any france manager said england don t have any weaknesses, that could be mind have any weaknesses, that could be mind games or trulyjust respect. but england, the messaging coming from the but england, the messaging coming from the camp, is that they are coming from the camp, is that they are coming into this one and having to put a coming into this one and having to put a marker down and reach the semifinals put a marker down and reach the semifinals put a marker down and reach the semifinals. ., ., ~ , , semifinals. you mentioned mbappe, obviously the semifinals. you mentioned mbappe, obviously the french semifinals. you mentioned mbappe, obviously the french coach - semifinals. you mentioned mbappe, obviously the french coach said - semifinals. you mentioned mbappe, obviously the french coach said yes, i obviously the french coach said yes, he is the man who can make a difference, but you look across that front line has well and you think about france s record g
american people to pay for billions and billions more for ukraine. it is an issue and senator romney is trying to lay a marker down, old school republican democrats want to spend money. they believe it helps with their base, but they also think on the student loan thing, blanket forgiving them when president biden is not ready to go, but the republicans think it helps in the suburbs where people think gas is costing me a lot of money, groceries is costing me a lot of money, be careful, don t start throwing money around. you talked about what president biden may or may not do here. he said he won t do the $50,000 forgiveness that some progressives want. does he have to give them something? yes. but the question is what. and, john, this is a trademark example of how democrats behave differently than republicans and they always have. i ve been doing this for 40 years now. the democrats fight it out publicly. republicans try to settle most policy disputes. without that, they try to set
rather arduous in the end that maybe he doesn t want to do many parts of him that don t want to do this. but maybe ult me deciding this is the right thing to do. i would weigh in with maybe he thought it was really bad. and andrew knows a lot more about this, viewers will remember many of the different prosecutions you ve done where you have to put yourself back in the mind of what the people thought at the time. this has exploded to become an existential threat to the donald trump presidency in a way that many other scandals have not. but you have to look at what people thought before it exploded, before they knew there d be a whistle-blower. back when speaker pelosi was telling everyone we are not going to do an impeachment vote before the election and donald trump was on his way to a re-election campaign with mueller in the rear view. what were people thinking then? and i think and i m saying this as reported analysis not proven yet today. but i think the theory of the case incr