Here. When you are go tonight, donald trump had never been indicted for anything. Alex wagner goes on tv for one year. One year. And the man gets indicted in four different jurisdictions, and so you know what that means . Donald trump is wondering tonight, whether alex wagner is going to do another year of her show. She hopes to. He really wants to know that, because he wants to be able to s fortunes are tied to mine. Yes. In other words, he has another very bad year coming. Thats what this has to. Mean perhaps. If youre reading the tea leaves, lawrence, i think they would tell you that. Im just happy to be still here standing after one long very short year. Ive got to say its the fastest year in the history of this kind of occupation. By far. Lawrence, it sure feels like that. By far. It is. It is a thrill to be sharing some time with you each and every night that im on the air, my friend. I am deeply grateful for our friendship and our camaraderie. This is always my favorite minute o
House of representatives. President bidens reelection campaign, Chuck Schumer saying thats what the senators gonna be running on. Hakeem jeffries is gonna join us tonight on this historic night, the one Year Anniversary of that legislation and tell us how the democrats are gonna be running. One more thing, on this night one year ago, what . As you might remember, it was the very First Edition of alec wet alex wagner tonight, and i just want to note something here. When you are go tonight, donald trump had never been indicted for anything. Alex wagner goes on tv for one year. One year. And the man gets indicted in four different jurisdictions, and so you know what that means . Donald trump is wondering tonight, whether alex wagner is going to do another year of her show. She hopes to. He really wants to know that, because he wants to be able to s fortunes are tied to mine. Yes. In other words, he has another very bad year coming. Thats what this has to. Mean perhaps. If youre reading th
closest advisers. secret service was omnipresent, full stop. those text were and by the agents but a city in the rooms where it happened could be the key to the investigation, as testimony, of course, presents themselves as well. giving evidence about the coronation of trump s plans leading up to and on the day of the riot, but who spoke to the president that day, who also was in the room as things were happening, and what the president may have told them. maybe communications about what exactly was happening inside the white house over those nearly 187 minutes, well over three hours, filling in the gaps, gap soon when donald trump told supporters to go to the capitol and when he tweeted a video to the rioters telling them that he loved them and to go home. we know that is the very focus of thursday s primetime hearing. we have someone tonight who knows the people who were in the white house with then president trump during those three hours. he knows them quite well. trump s
Again, i think you will see from the district attorney in her response, laying out how all of these things are all related to state elections, which is not the responsibility of the president of the united states. if it is not his responsibility, then it cannot transfer to the chief of staff. barb mcquade, when the federal judges evaluating mark meadows behavior, is it worth noting that no previous white house chief of staff in history as ever done any one of those things after a presidential election? i suppose it s worth noting, but i don t know how far that goes. i think instead the real question here is, as you say, in the motion filed by mark meadows he describes all of these acts as the kinds of things that are chief of staff does. i made phone calls, i arranged meetings, i was acting as an emissary. those facts on their face are fine. but it was the purpose of those acts that is what makes them criminal and beyond the scope of his duties as the chief of
Into 2016, but that describes a lot of republicans. they may have worked for another republican during the 2016 election. he wouldn t be hard-core trump to me. i think he supported the president and administration for several years. if he saw something that encouraged him or forced him to resign, much as i did, i respect that. he has no reason to lie. matt pottinger was probably better off professionally to sail off in the sunset and do a lot of his academic work. it does not benefit him from by coming forward at this point and saying i have something to say. it is probably bad for his can we are to do this because of the public attention that it will. i think of math says something tomorrow under oath, i will believe it, or at least put a great deal of credibility on the, until somebody comes forward. that is matt is a very credible guy. it will be curious to see what he has to say. this coming thursday will be the primetime hearing. i am curious as to what you make of mark meadows