congress reaffirms its intention to allow the fda to preempt any state laws that would be in conflict with what the fda decides to do in this space. but even then we never imagined that a judge a trump judge in this case would go back 23 years and say, we don't even agree with the original approval of this widely used safe medication abortion pill. this is how extreme the federal judiciary has become under donald trump because of his activist judges that he has appointed. i mean, there's nothing conservative about this decision for the reasons that we just heard described to us, including issues like standing and of course, there was a federal court in washington state. contrary ruling didn't so now, whe does that leave? i'm confused at this federal judge in washitostate, then said. the opposite of what this judge said, and i'mot sure where that leaves us in your thoughts. first, the ruling that came out just after the texas ruling was because several liberal states