tell us what else you ve learned. i mean, i think it s significant especially the photos yout discussed last hou that show just how this was organized. i think a key part of this is essentially them not trusting the trump team because after they had that initial grand jury subpoena that was delivered, you had this filing that was signed by a trump lawyer, name is redacted in this latest filing, so weis don t know based on the filing who it was, but has been reported publicly about this trump lawyercl said there was n responsive documents left. lo and behold when they went and executed the search warrant there were allec these document left. so there s still information we don t know about how they got the source of that information. but the key part of it is that they were right. we can see by the product what they were able to seize from donald trump s mar-a-lago facilityag down there that the information they had about himt continuing to hold onat to classified informatio
mar-a-lago. trump has a whole lot of other properties, trump tower, bedminster, the place up in west chester. do we think those other residences of trumps are going to get searched any time soon. reason to believe he would only keep all this jazz down there? there s no indication of that so far, but i wanted to point out one part in the timeline i think is important. one thing we learned in addition to this filing is just how many classified documents were turned over voluntarily, quote unquote, in response to the subpoena that was issued in may and was acted upon in early june. remember, there s this initial box, initial 15 boxes turned over to the national archives. whole bunch of classified documents that weren t supposed to be there sitting aside the fact he wasn t supposed to have any of those documents to begin with. fast forward five months down the line to may, may of this year, when they issued that grand jury subpoena in response to that grand jury subpoena, the president s
rebuilding america, creating tens of millions of good paying jobs, to me it doesn t add up. do you think he planned this all along? this was the plan all along? get you there, and walk out and lo and behold there s a press conference right away? there s a lot of speculation. i m not sure everybody in the room from his team knew it, but when he walked out he went to the rose garden that had a chart that said no collusion. and the press had been told to go to the rose garden. so obviously, somebody planned it. if they made a chart. do you think there s something specifically about speaker pelosi that gets under the president s skin? it seems he has a different reaction to her than he does to senator schumer. she s incredibly smart woman. and she s tough, she will work with him, but she s very savvy and i i don t think he does
interested in working with the white house, which some republicans say they re really not interested in having an infrastructure deal because they don t want to have anything that shows the president having a success, would something like saying what speaker pelosi said, doesn t that hurt the effort? anderson, this president tweets multiple times a day attacking people. we are talking about ongoing questions here and investigations. suddenly to have an internal private meeting that she had with her caucus and something that she said be a reason not to move forward on behalf of the american people to solve one of our biggest needs, which is rebuilding america, creating tens of millions of good paying jobs, to me it doesn t add up. do you think he planned this all along? this was the plan all along? get you there, and walk out and lo and behold there s a press conference right away? there s a lot of speculation. i m not sure everybody in the
he talked with cnn s national political correspondent jim acosta this evening. governor, thanks for joining us. let s talk first about this controversy over when you left bain capital. i ll put one of the documents in question up on screen. their sec filing stating that you were ceo at bain capital past 1999. when you say you left bain to run the olympics. why was your name still on these documents? and why didn t you clear this up sooner? well, i was the owner of an entity that is filing that information. but i had no role whatsoever in the management of bain capital after february of 1999. not that that would have been a problem to have said i was with the firm beyond that but i simply wasn t. i left to go out and run the olympics. i did that full-time. relinquished all management authority and role in bain capital after february 1999. how do you explain that discrepancy? you said publicly you left the firm in 1999. weren t you concerned at some point these filings mi