24 meeting and take away my opportunity and the opportunities of commissioners to hear from peep thats a shame that would be a shame well have alls conversations not in the middle of this meeting captain lazarus please continue with our report okay. Go back to the slide with the central district. Okay in terms of the foot beat. Youre out of order youre out of order so heres how this will go im going to say that would Great Sadness unfortunately, the important work the Police Commission will not continue tonight ill invite a motion to journey this meeting people are out of order i apologize from the people from chinatown and Central Station that came to raise a dough have a motion journey. Second. All in favor, say i. I. That motion the mayor, by the way, is in route. He will join us shortly. He just had to meet with another elected official that happens to be running for president. So when hes done meeting with her hes on his way. So, my name is richard lines up and i want to welcome y
Was that they got an opportunity to go to court. And thats referred to as constructive exhaustion of revenues. And the plaintiff has an absolute right to go to court after 20 working days. But its not clear that they have much other remedy. But anyway, judge brown, kettani Brown Jackson said that this case, the crew case basically stood for the proposition that once the agency had not responded in time you got to go to court. And that was it. Epic argued largely because they had won this on similar situations in 2006, that there was a presumption that the agency would violate by not responding on time and that gave them permission to continue the case process to have the case process. Jackson basically said well now that the crew case exists, the crew versus fcc fcc basically the only remedy you have is to go to court and hopefully you can get the court to be more and amenable to your argument but you dont get to force the agency to respond any more quickly. Basically under the process