severely limit and constrict this investigation? on that specific point that david just mentioned, potentially, the release of this memo today, if it is shown that the republican majority in the house intelligence community, was working in coordination with the white house to release it, to damage mueller, to damage the russia investigation, that could be an element in the obstruction of justice. well, to be honest, i think that s a little farfetched. devin nunes and the house republicans have any political motive in the world to help the president who is a member of their party. they re certainly loud to do that. i don t think there s any serious claim they are committing a crime by doing it. it is something the voters can evaluate when they go to the poles and dd whether this is something they want their legislateors to be doing.
going other way. otherwise you give the president going forward. the politics of it the optics the president is going to have to defer to congress. if he doesn t he faces real problems. they ve got to start the white house has got to start making the case around issues that people are most concerned about. i think for the president to dwell on this point about whether the iranians recognize israel is not a winner he s got to focus on whether or not inspections are going to be able to take place at any given time and that these facilities where people believe uranium is going to be enriched if he focuses there he has a much better chance. i agree. we ve seen stories about i guess the wall street journal this weekend had a story about how this is fraying the traditional ties between the democratic party and israeli supporters and jewish voters. i personally i don t know. i ve heard this a million times. 80% of jewish voters end up voting democratic at the end. but there are leg
although the background check isn t the best, at least they came to some sort of agreement. when was the last time that happened? and the public is engaged in the debate, and the public demanding action from legislateors. that s critical. we are taking on so many issues, agreement isn t always to be celebrated. on the issue of background checks, i don t think it s a compromise worth having. okay, well, i m kind of depressed by you today, will. sorry. will kain, robert zimmerman. talk about a spoiler alert. kevin bacon of the following reveals a major plot twist and now he s apologizing. carfirmation.
saying, did she just say that? if you don t believe me, take a listen. > and, finally, mr. speaker, i m flattered are you all so interested in my vagina, but no means no. that s right. she made a political argument, and while she did, she used the correct designation for her own anatomy. why did state representative brown dare mention her lady parts in the michigan legislature? on wednesday, michigan joined 24 other states, which have passed 100 provisions restricting action to abortions in the past twoñi years. shutting down reproductive rights, a hallmark of republican legislateors it seems michigan lawmakers were also prepared to silence women s voices. after speaking about her vagina and a woman s right to say no, the michigan house on thursday banned brown from speaking on the house floor, but brown is not so easily deterred. maybe they could keep her from