last night asked that investigators regain access to 125 documents found in that search of mar-a-lago. that is part of the extraordinary appeal to cannon s order which politico puts like this, it aims to a full-throated rebuke of the ruling by cannon, a trump appointee who was confirmed to a seat after trump s defeat in the 2020 election. prosecutors used the filing to describe her ruling as a danger to national security and one ignorant to the counterintelligence work and lacking in an understanding of the complexities of executive privilege. all of it and the bid to continue to use the classified documents from mar-a-lago in the investigation amounts to a bold gamut from doj. once again, from politico, quote, they re going forward with an appeal despite the risk of cementing an awful precedent. we re getting an even worse ruling from an appeals court dominated by trump appointees and they re daring cannon to double down on analysts that legal analysts on the right and left
nominations says trump in his republican allies sought out judicial nominees like cannon showing an overwhelming preference for individuals often lacking the experience previously considered necessary to sit on the bench. this reporting, i think, makes clear that she was targeted by truck and i m not nearing anything close to sympathy. she made her own bed and she gets to lie it in now and it s laying bare at trump s cravenness. also, look, i think it is very heartening that the department of justice did not blink in the face of a visibly bad decision. 24 decision wasn t even workman like and it exposes the flaw in her legal reasoning and understanding. i don t think the department of justice had any any choice other than to appeal that ruling. it s also an indication that they regarded the stakes as so high that they couldn t let