The not into tomorrow today, Youll Find Show on D W mice on by far the most common, the oratory animals especially bread for this purpose for around a century. Without them many medical Breakthroughs Wouldnt have been possible. For instance, lab might have been used to study the immune system, as well as in Cancer Research and drug development. In the russian City Of nova, the Beer Monument has even been erected in their honor. So there are no alternatives. Lab mice of sue, indispensable to scientific research. This man does invaluable work at the Max Planck Institute for molecular. G, ethics in berlin. Ah, it helps the scientists here gain insights into congenital malformations. Today its due to be inspected by professor Stefan Montrose and his team. At 1st glance, it looks just like any other regular mess, but then you notice that 4 of its toes are missing because people also want to find out what causes this kind of developmental defect or the most the mouse is a useful object of st
information that is favorable to the accused because all favorable information is critically relevant to that determination. the commitment of nacdl and the foundation for criminal justice to seek reform in the area of fair disclosure is one of the many areas in which we are working to make our criminal justice system fairer and more humane across a wide range of issues. in recent months we have worked to expand access to counsel, promote reform of the nation s indigent reform system, address ethnic and racial disparity in the criminal justice system, explore the impact of militarization of the nation s law enforcement infrastructure, rein in overcriminalization and promote the restoration of rights and status for those who have had a brush with the criminal law. all of this is a reflection of the core mission of america s criminal defense bar, liberty s last champions as we define ourselves. fairness is the bedrock principle of any society and of any judicial system. the ref
until the fiscal cliff. and i know you know that already, but guess what, folks? the deadline for congress and the white house to act, to stop the tax increase and punishing spending cuts, that deadline is coming up quicker than you may realize because did you know, congress plans to end its current session on december 21st? check your calendar as we did today. that s two weeks from friday. that means that under congressional rules any agreement, any legislation to fix this whole mess would have to be filed here by december 28th. here s the kicker. the president currently plans to leave town the day before that, on the 17th of this month. so the yearly obama trip to hawaii is set to start a week from next monday. you feel me here? see where i m going? the window closing faster than folks think. what are our decisionmakers doing right now? among other things they are apparently sending signals through the media. republicans saying time to get moving. the president saying there
the americans tax rates are going up. the americans paycheck will get a lot smaller. that would be the wrong thing to do for our economy. it would hurt middle-class families and it would hurt the businesses that depend on your spending. and congress can prevent it from happening, if they act now. leaders in congress are working on a way to prevent this tax hike on the middle class and i believe we may be able to reach an agreement that can pass both houses in time. but, if an agreement is not reached on time, i will urge the senate to hold an up or down vote on a basic package that protect the middle tax from the income tax hike, extends vital unemployment insurance and lays the groundwork for future progress on more economic growth and deficit reduction. i believe such a proposal could pass both houses with bipartisan majorities, as long as these leaders allow it to come to a vote. they still want to vote no, let tax hikes it the middle class, that is their prerogative. but
before this was a political issue, that established by the state, establishes use consistently throughout the statute a particular way, when state is defined in the statute, a definition that they didn t mention, states expressly defined in the statute to include d.c., not include the federal government, territories that are defined as equivalent for certain purposes, federal government never is, when people outside the political context engaged the statute, what was there unpoliticized read of the statute? federal agencies haven t been very forth coming with everything, but, you know, there certainly are efforts to try and look at what did neutral folks, when they read the statute, think it meant, because obviously now everyone who reads the statute has a sense of what the possible implications are. crs, for example, did an early read where they said basically go by plain text. pretty strong argument that this is limited. acknowledge that you could also find it ambiguous. ir